The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trait-based perspectives of leadership.
Abstract
The trait-based perspective of leadership has a long but checkered history. Trait approaches dominated the initial decades of scientific leadership research. Later, they were disdained for their inability to offer clear distinctions between leaders and nonleaders and for their failure to account for situational variance in leadership behavior. Recently, driven by greater conceptual, methodological, and statistical sophistication, such approaches have again risen to prominence. However, their contributions are likely to remain limited unless leadership researchers who adopt this perspective address several fundamental issues. The author argues that combinations of traits and attributes, integrated in conceptually meaningful ways, are more likely to predict leadership than additive or independent contributions of several single traits. Furthermore, a defining core of these dominant leader trait patterns reflects a stable tendency to lead in different ways across disparate organizational domains. Finally, the author summarizes a multistage model that specifies some leader traits as having more distal influences on leadership processes and performance, whereas others have more proximal effects that are integrated with, and influenced by, situational parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Day, D. V. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00061-8 · Cited by 2,180
Leadership skills for a changing world
Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00041-7 · Cited by 888
Self-citationZaccaro, S. J., Foti, R. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.308 · Cited by 424 · cited 1×
“Also, observations of low cross-situational stability in leader emergence have not been supported in other experimental studies (Ferentinos, 1996; Zaccaro, Foti, & Kenny, 1991) or in reanalyses of the earlier research cited as evidence for situational specificity (Kenny & Zaccaro, 1983).”
ResultSelf-citationFiedler, F. E. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031454 · Cited by 343
The person versus the situation in leadership
Sternberg, R. J., & Vroom, V. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00101-7 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005 · Cited by 1,426
Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015848 · Cited by 1,114
Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity
Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.61968043 · Cited by 530
Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: the counterbalancing effect of leader humility.
Owens, B. P., Wallace, A. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038698 · Cited by 407
Hoch, J. E., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.012 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaccaro, S. J.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-16
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1982700507
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 73.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trait-based perspectives of leadership. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0003-066x.62.1.6
- The paper
- Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.1.6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.