The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?
Open accessAbstract
In anticipation of the impending revision of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, APA's Publications and Communications Board formed the Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS) and charged it to provide the board with background and recommendations on information that should be included in manuscripts submitted to APA journals that report (a) new data collections and (b) meta-analyses. The JARS Group reviewed efforts in related fields to develop standards and sought input from other knowledgeable groups. The resulting recommendations contain (a) standards for all journal articles, (b) more specific standards for reports of studies with experimental manipulations or evaluations of interventions using research designs involving random or nonrandom assignment, and (c) standards for articles reporting meta-analyses. The JARS Group anticipated that standards for reporting other research designs (e.g., observational studies, longitudinal studies) would emerge over time. This report also (a) examines societal developments that have encouraged researchers to provide more details when reporting their studies, (b) notes important differences between requirements, standards, and recommendations for reporting, and (c) examines benefits and obstacles to the development and implementation of reporting standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The CONSORT checklist (Schulz et al., 2010) (Appendix A) and JARS guidelines (American Psychological Association, 2008) were applied in reporting the findings.”
From An online acceptance, commitment, and self-compassion based treatment to decrease psychological distress in people with type 2 diabetes: A feasibility randomised-controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as American Psychological Association, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., Gøtzsche, P. C., Lang, T., & for the CONSORT Group (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012 · Cited by 3,835
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the TREND Group (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.361 · Cited by 2,817
Evidence-based practice in psychology.
American Psychological Association (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.271 · Cited by 2,478
Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach
Cooper, H. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071878644 · Cited by 1,716
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- American Psychological Association, Council of Editors 1952 Publication manual of the American Psychological Association Psychological Bulletin 49 Suppl, Pt 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 571
Improving Causal Inferences in Meta-analyses of Longitudinal Studies: Spanking as an Illustration
Larzelere, R. E., Gunnoe, M. L., & Ferguson, C. J. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13097 · Cited by 37
Goodman, J. S., Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2014) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2013.0188 · Cited by 36
A Series of Meta-Analytic Tests of the Efficacy of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy
Woll-Weber, C. F. J., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000385 · Cited by 37
The efficacy of work engagement interventions: A meta-analysis of controlled trials
Vîrgă, D., Maricutoiu, L. P., & Iancu, A. (2019) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00438-z · Cited by 43
Zach, S., Dobersek, U., Filho, E., Inglis, V., & Tenenbaum, G. (2017) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.09.011 · Cited by 40
Examining the Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Preliminary ReportPreprint
Lakens, D., Page‐Gould, E., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Spellman, B., Schönbrodt, F. D., Hasselman, F., Corker, K. S., Grange, J., Sharples, A. E., Cavender, C., et al. (2017) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/xfbjf · Cited by 39
A Review of Issues and Concerns of Family Members of Adult Burn Survivors
Sundara, D. C. (2011) · Journal of Burn Care & Research · doi:10.1097/bcr.0b013e318217f6cb · Cited by 35
Beelmann, A. (2014) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-014-0509-2 · Cited by 42
Publication Manual of The American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition
โชควิวัฒน, น. (2017) · Cited by 34
Parsons, J., Newby, K. V., & French, D. (2018) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12340 · Cited by 34
Sabik, N. J., Matsick, J. L., McCormick‐Huhn, K., & Cole, E. R. (2021) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843211035678 · Cited by 35
Yuen, M., & Wu, L. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05164-1 · Cited by 49
The Validity of Conscientiousness Is Overestimated in the Prediction of Job Performance
Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141468 · Cited by 38
Inclusion and exclusion strategies for conducting meta-analyses
Swift, J. K., & Wampold, B. E. (2017) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2017.1405169 · Cited by 39
Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses
Patall, E. A. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2021.1897009 · Cited by 37
Hagger, M. S. (2022) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2021.1966824 · Cited by 41
Systematic Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Detecting Developmental Stuttering
Barrett, L., Hu, J., & Howell, P. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3155295 · Cited by 35
Hyperbrain features of team mental models within a juggling paradigm: a proof of concept
Filho, E., Bertollo, M., Tamburro, G., Schinaia, L., Chatel-Goldman, J., di Fronso, S., Robazza, C., & Comani, S. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2457 · Cited by 36
If It Were Only That Easy: The Use of Meta-Analytic Research by Organizational Scholars
DeSimone, J. A., Köhler, T., & Schoen, J. L. B. (2018) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428118756743 · Cited by 33
Niemeyer, H., Musch, J., & Pietrowsky, R. (2012) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.023 · Cited by 31
Chan, L. E., Heinemann, A. W., & Roberts, J. (2014) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.682004 · Cited by 32
Meissner, C. A. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3808 · Cited by 34
van Knippenberg, R. J. M., de Vugt, M. E., Ponds, R., Myin‐Germeys, I., & Verhey, F. R. J. (2018) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.004 · Cited by 30
El potencial de la enseñanza del vocabulario basada en corpus: optimismo con precaución
Asención‐Delaney, Y., Collentine, J., Collentine, K., Colmenares, J. J., & Plonsky, L. (2015) · Journal of Spanish Language Teaching · doi:10.1080/23247797.2015.1105516 · Cited by 29
Peters, G.-J., & Crutzen, R. (2020) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2020.1757098 · Cited by 32
Like Schrödinger’s cat, the impact bias is both dead and alive: Reply to Wilson and Gilbert (2013).
Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., Kaplan, R. L., & Safer, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034340 · Cited by 28
Primary Study Quality in Psychological Meta-Analyses: An Empirical Assessment of Recent Practice
Hohn, R. E., Slaney, K. L., & Tafreshi, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02667 · Cited by 27
Kurdi, B., Morehouse, K. N., & Dunham, Y. C. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000329 · Cited by 36
Improving Second Language Quantitative Research
Norris, J. M., Ross, S. J., & Schoonen, R. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12110 · Cited by 28
Azar, M., Riehm, K. E., McKay, D., & Thombs, B. D. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142894 · Cited by 29
Writing Mixed Research Reports
Leech, N. L. (2012) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764211433800 · Cited by 33
Reporting on Interventions: Issues and Guidelines for Rehabilitation Researchers
Dijkers, M. P. J. M. (2015) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.017 · Cited by 27
Hensel, W. M. (2020) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-020-00317-6 · Cited by 28
Meta-Analysis of Research in Social and Personality Psychology
Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996481.031 · Cited by 27
Comprehensive computer searches and reporting in systematic reviews
Fehrmann, P. G., & Thomas, J. (2011) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.31 · Cited by 27
Standards of reporting: the use of CONSORT PRO and CERT in individuals living with osteoporosis
Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., Santos, E., & Brooks, K. (2017) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4249-z · Cited by 28
Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials
Grant, S., Montgomery, P., Hopewell, S., Macdonald, G. M., Moher, D., & Mayo‐Wilson, E. (2013) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731513498118 · Cited by 28
An A–Z of Applied Linguistics Research Methods
Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3_1 · Cited by 36
Less is less: a systematic review of graph use in meta‐analyses
Schild, A. H. E., & Voracek, M. (2013) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1076 · Cited by 24
Tovmasyan, A., Monk, R., Sawicka, I., & Heim, D. (2022) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2022.2082300 · Cited by 22
Depression and anxiety after total joint replacement among older adults: a meta-analysis
Scott, J. E., Mathias, J. L., & Kneebone, A. C. (2015) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1072801 · Cited by 26
Barry, A. E., Szucs, L. E., Reyes, J. V., Ji, Q., Wilson, K. L., & Thompson, B. (2016) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198116669521 · Cited by 27
A meta-analysis of memory ability in synaesthesia
Ward, J., Field, A. P., & Chin, T. (2019) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1646771 · Cited by 24
Pre-Registration in Social Psychology—a Discussion and Suggested TemplatePreprint
Veer, A. V. '., & Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2016) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4frms · Cited by 31
Participant diversity in Psychophysiology
Kissel, H. A., & Friedman, B. H. (2023) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14369 · Cited by 28
Scalabrini, A., Cavicchioli, M., Benedetti, F., Mucci, C., & Northoff, G. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02520-w · Cited by 25
Stajković, A. D., Lee, D., Greenwald, J. M., & Raffiee, J. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.02.001 · Cited by 24
Reproducing the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition
Beaujean, A. A. (2016) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282916642679 · Cited by 24
Reporting Standards for Intervention Effectiveness Studies
Gutman, S. A. (2010) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2010.09644 · Cited by 24
McClain, M. B., Callan, G. L., Harris, B., Floyd, R. G., Haverkamp, C. R., Golson, M. E., Longhurst, D. N., & Benallie, K. J. (2021) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2020.11.002 · Cited by 24
Treatment acceptability of interventions published in six school psychology journals
Villarreal, V., Ponce, C. S., & Gutierrez, H. (2015) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034315574153 · Cited by 23
Baucom, K. J. W., Chen, X. S., Perry, N. S., Revolorio, K. Y., Reina, A., & Christensen, A. (2017) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12287 · Cited by 23
Albers, C. A., Floyd, R. G., Fuhrmann, M. J., & Martínez, R. S. (2011) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.002 · Cited by 23
Cunha, O. S., Pedrosa, J., Pereira, B., Caridade, S., Rodrigues, A. D. C., & Braga, T. (2024) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380231224036 · Cited by 22
Du, R. Y., Lam, P. P. Y., Yiu, C. K. Y., & McGrath, C. P. J. (2020) · International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry · doi:10.1111/ipd.12688 · Cited by 22
Putting Things into Context: A Meta-Analysis of Media Context Effects on Attitudinal Outcomes
Kwon, E. S., Nyilasy, G., King, K. W., & Reid, L. N. (2021) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1895920 · Cited by 25
Jesús-Romero, R. D., Holder-Dixon, A. R., Buss, J., & Lorenzo‐Luaces, L. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/50780 · Cited by 29
Programmatic Research to Increase the Effectiveness of Health Communication Campaigns
Harrington, N. G., Palmgreen, P., & Donohew, L. (2014) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.954082 · Cited by 23
Janowich, J. R., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1502-1 · Cited by 22
Zhao, J., Beckett, G. H., & Wang, L. L. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317690813 · Cited by 23
Wilson, D., de Oliveira, D. R., Palace‐Berl, F., Ponteciano, B. D. M., Rissatti, L. F., Pollizi, V. P., de Miranda, F. S., D’Almeida, V., & Demarzo, M. (2022) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100427 · Cited by 23
Psychometric properties of the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) skills examination
Lineberry, M. C., & Ritter, E. M. (2017) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5590-1 · Cited by 21
Estimation accuracy in the psychological sciences
Davis‐Stober, C. P., Dana, J. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207239 · Cited by 19
How to Do Meta-Analysis with SPSS?
Şen, S. (2019) · Harran Education Journal · doi:10.22596/2019.0401.21.49 · Cited by 21
Recent Research Trends in Meta-analysis
Shin, I. (2017) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2017.05.004 · Cited by 20
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
Mayo‐Wilson, E., Montgomery, P., Hopewell, S., Macdonald, G. M., Moher, D., & Grant, S. (2013) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123745 · Cited by 22
Guideline for Reporting Standards of Eye-tracking Research in Decision SciencesPreprint
Fiedler, S., Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, M., Renkewitz, F., & Orquin, J. L. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/f6qcy · Cited by 21
Pehlivan, M., Sherman, K. A., Wuthrich, V. M., Gandhi, E., Zagic, D., Kopp, E., & Perica, V. (2023) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2023.2245020 · Cited by 23
Francis, J., Vella‐Brodrick, D., & Chin, T. (2021) · International Journal of Wellbeing · doi:10.5502/ijw.v11i4.1465 · Cited by 20
Breuer, S., Ortner, T. M., Gruber, F. M., Hofstetter, D., & Scherndl, T. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111918 · Cited by 24
Martella, A. M., Martella, R. C., Yatcilla, J., Newson, A., Shannon, E. N., & Voorhis, C. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09826-1 · Cited by 25
Scammacca, N. K., Fall, A., & Roberts, G. (2014) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.952464 · Cited by 20
Duggan, M., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.14330.2 · Cited by 22
Rights, J. D., & Cole, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1528550 · Cited by 20
Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials
Montgomery, P., Mayo‐Wilson, E., Hopewell, S., Macdonald, G. M., Moher, D., & Grant, S. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301447 · Cited by 20
Fedewa, A. L., Ahn, S., Reese, R. J., Suarez, M. M., Macquoid, A., Davis, M. C., & Prout, H. T. (2016) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2016.03.001 · Cited by 24
Norris, J. M. (2012) · The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0761 · Cited by 20
Overview of meta-analyses on giftedness
Oğurlu, Ü. (2020) · Gifted and Talented International · doi:10.1080/15332276.2021.1893135 · Cited by 19
Innovation and Integrity: Desiderata and Future Directions for Prevention and Intervention Science
Beelmann, A., Malti, T., Noam, G., & Sommer, S. (2018) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-018-0869-6 · Cited by 22
Curtailing the Use of Preregistration : A Misused Term
Rice, D. B., & Moher, D. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619858427 · Cited by 23
Plonsky, L. (2011) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 19
Editorial: How to Write an Effective Results and Discussion for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Drotar, D. (2009) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp014 · Cited by 19
Madrigal, C. B., Mills, W. L., Keleher, V., Pimentel, C. B., Hartmann, C. W., Snow, A. L., Camp, C. J., & Hilgeman, M. M. (2022) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnac133 · Cited by 21
National Mean IQ Estimates: Validity, Data Quality, and Recommendations
Warne, R. T. (2022) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-022-00351-y · Cited by 21
REPORT-SCS: minimum reporting standards for spinal cord stimulation studies in spinal cord injury
Malik, R. N., Samejima, S., Shackleton, C., Miller, T., Pedrocchi, A., Rabchevsky, A. G., Moritz, C. T., Darrow, D., Field-Fote, E. C., Guanziroli, E., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad2290 · Cited by 18
Academic Standards for Writing
Troia, G. A., Olinghouse, N. G., Mo, Y., Hawkins, L. K., Kopke, R. A., Chen, A., Wilson, J., & Stewart, K. A. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/683984 · Cited by 24
Arnberg, F. K., Alaie, I., Parling, T., & Jonsson, U. (2013) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.08.019 · Cited by 19
Cavicchioli, M., Sarzetto, A., Erzegovesi, S., & Ogliari, A. L. (2022) · PubMed · doi:10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220507 · Cited by 20
Cavicchioli, M., Ogliari, A. C., Maffei, C., Mucci, C., Northoff, G., & Scalabrini, A. (2023) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13547 · Cited by 18
System-level effects of integrating a promising treatment into juvenile drug courts
McCart, M. R., Henggeler, S. W., Chapman, J. E., & Cunningham, P. B. (2011) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.030 · Cited by 17
Should Psychology Journals Adopt Specialized Statistical Review?
Hardwicke, T. E., Frank, M. C., Vazire, S., & Goodman, S. N. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919858428 · Cited by 20
Brazão, N., Rijo, D., Salvador, M. D. C., & Pinto‐Gouveia, J. (2017) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000247 · Cited by 18
Grant, S., & on behalf of the CONSORT‐SPI Group (2018) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14411 · Cited by 19
Chetcuti, L., Uljarević, M., Schuck, R. K., Hardan, A. Y., Gengoux, G. W., Trembath, D. L., Vadgama, Y., Varcin, K. J., Vivanti, G., Whitehouse, A., et al. (2025) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102588 · Cited by 20
Rios, J. A., Ihlenfeldt, S. D., Dosedel, M., & Riegelman, A. (2019) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12282 · Cited by 15
Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis
Moher, D. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0509-y · Cited by 17
The impact of therapists’ words on the adolescent brain: In the context of addiction treatment
Ewing, S. W. F., Houck, J. M., Yezhuvath, U. S., Kojori, E. S., Truitt, D., & Filbey, F. M. (2015) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.041 · Cited by 18
Rigor and reproducibility for data analysis and design in the behavioral sciences
Hildebrandt, T., & Prenoveau, J. M. (2020) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103552 · Cited by 17
Hypnotherapy for disability-related pain: A meta-analysis
Bowker, E., & Dorstyn, D. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314530452 · Cited by 17
Integrative Propositional Analysis: A New Quantitative Method for Evaluating Theories in Psychology
Wallis, S. E. (2015) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000048 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards
- Corresponding author
- APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 839-851
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- PMC
- PMC2957094
- OpenAlex
- W2444484626
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD048962)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, research reporting, APA Publication Manual, meta-analysis reporting, intervention evaluation, random assignment, research transparency
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Psychology, Publishing, Research Design, Societies, Scientific, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review