The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?
Open accessAbstract
In anticipation of the impending revision of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, APA's Publications and Communications Board formed the Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS) and charged it to provide the board with background and recommendations on information that should be included in manuscripts submitted to APA journals that report (a) new data collections and (b) meta-analyses. The JARS Group reviewed efforts in related fields to develop standards and sought input from other knowledgeable groups. The resulting recommendations contain (a) standards for all journal articles, (b) more specific standards for reports of studies with experimental manipulations or evaluations of interventions using research designs involving random or nonrandom assignment, and (c) standards for articles reporting meta-analyses. The JARS Group anticipated that standards for reporting other research designs (e.g., observational studies, longitudinal studies) would emerge over time. This report also (a) examines societal developments that have encouraged researchers to provide more details when reporting their studies, (b) notes important differences between requirements, standards, and recommendations for reporting, and (c) examines benefits and obstacles to the development and implementation of reporting standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The CONSORT checklist (Schulz et al., 2010) (Appendix A) and JARS guidelines (American Psychological Association, 2008) were applied in reporting the findings.”
From An online acceptance, commitment, and self-compassion based treatment to decrease psychological distress in people with type 2 diabetes: A feasibility randomised-controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as American Psychological Association, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., Gøtzsche, P. C., Lang, T., & for the CONSORT Group (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012 · Cited by 3,835
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the TREND Group (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.361 · Cited by 2,817
Evidence-based practice in psychology.
American Psychological Association (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.271 · Cited by 2,478
Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach
Cooper, H. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071878644 · Cited by 1,716
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- American Psychological Association, Council of Editors 1952 Publication manual of the American Psychological Association Psychological Bulletin 49 Suppl, Pt 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 571
Locklear, L. R., Sheridan, S. B., & Kong, D. T. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2624 · Cited by 133
Emotional Competence and Anxiety in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review
Mathews, B. L., Koehn, A. J., Abtahi, M. M., & Kerns, K. A. (2016) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-016-0204-3 · Cited by 130
Chevance, G., Bernard, P., Chamberland, P.-É., & Rebar, A. L. (2019) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1618726 · Cited by 121
Coutlee, C. G., Politzer, C. S., Hoyle, R., & Huettel, S. A. (2014) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000005 · Cited by 110
Hone, L. C., Jarden, A., & Schofield, G. M. (2015) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.965267 · Cited by 105
Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods
Anderson, L. M., Oliver, S. R., Michie, S., Rehfuess, E., Noyes, J., & Shemilt, I. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.014 · Cited by 101
Tay, L., Woo, S. E., Hickman, L., & Saef, R. M. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2290 · Cited by 105
Memory bias for threatening information related to anxiety: an updated meta-analytic review
Herrera, S., Montorio, I., Cabrera, I., & Botella, J. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2017.1319374 · Cited by 111
Kılıç, A., Hudson, J., McCracken, L. M., Ruparelia, R., Fawson, S., & Hughes, L. D. (2021) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2020.08.001 · Cited by 98
Ten‐year updated meta‐analysis of the clinical characteristics of pediatric mania and hypomania
Meter, A. V., Burke, C., Kowatch, R. A., Findling, R. L., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2016) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12358 · Cited by 101
Teacher–student relationships and student outcomes: A systematic second-order meta-analytic review.
Emslander, V., Holzberger, D., Ofstad, S. B., Fischbach, A., & Scherer, R. (2025) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000461 · Cited by 159
Herzog, P., Lauff, S., Rief, W., & Brakemeier, E. (2019) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1447 · Cited by 95
Bradley, H. A., Rucklidge, J. J., & Mulder, R. (2016) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12647 · Cited by 95
New Recommendations on the Use of R-Squared Differences in Multilevel Model Comparisons
Rights, J. D., & Sterba, S. K. (2019) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1660605 · Cited by 89
Medeiros, K. E., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. (2017) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-017-9281-2 · Cited by 70
Martín, F. D. F., Tirado, J. L. A., & Torres, M. H. (2020) · Psicologí a Educativa · doi:10.5093/psed2020a11 · Cited by 111
Beyond Cohen's d : Alternative Effect Size Measures for Between-Subject Designs
Peng, C. J., & Chen, L. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.745471 · Cited by 87
Kepes, S., Bennett, A. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2013.0193 · Cited by 99
Psychological Interventions for the Fear of Public Speaking: A Meta-Analysis
Ebrahimi, O. V., Pallesen, S., Kenter, R., & Nordgreen, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00488 · Cited by 62
The cohesion–performance relationship in sport: a 10-year retrospective meta-analysis
Filho, E., Dobersek, U., Gershgoren, L., Becker, B. J., & Tenenbaum, G. (2014) · Sport Sciences for Health · doi:10.1007/s11332-014-0188-7 · Cited by 102
Research Design in Clinical Psychology
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108993647 · Cited by 240
Instrument Reporting Practices in Second Language Research
Derrick, D. J. (2015) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.217 · Cited by 84
Making sense of learning gain in higher education
Evans, C., Kandiko Howson, C., & Forsythe, A. (2018) · Higher Education Pedagogies · doi:10.1080/23752696.2018.1508360 · Cited by 81
An update on the efficacy of psychological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults
Ponniah, K., Magiati, I., & Hollon, S. D. (2013) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.02.005 · Cited by 79
Effect of Placebo Conditions on Polysomnographic Parameters in Primary Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis
Winkler, A., & Rief, W. (2015) · SLEEP · doi:10.5665/sleep.4742 · Cited by 83
Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample
Sampson, M., Tetzlaff, J., & Urquhart, C. (2011) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.42 · Cited by 80
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
Mayo‐Wilson, E., Grant, S., Hopewell, S., Macdonald, G. M., Moher, D., & Montgomery, P. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-242 · Cited by 83
Coyne, J. C., Thombs, B. D., & Hagedoorn, M. (2010) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017633 · Cited by 84
Kossmeier, M., Tran, U. S., & Voracek, M. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-0911-9 · Cited by 83
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444347340.ch14 · Cited by 80
Fadlelmula, F. K., & Qadhi, S. M. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/pswgbw82 · Cited by 110
Lupas, K. K., & Fabiano, G. A. (2017) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/0014402917706370 · Cited by 84
Alcohol expectancy challenges for college students: A narrative review
Labbe, A. K., & Maisto, S. A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.007 · Cited by 77
Youth cyber dating abuse: A meta-analysis of risk and protective factors
Caridade, S. M. M., & Braga, T. (2020) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2020-3-2 · Cited by 76
Matos, M., Albuquerque, I., Galhardo, A. B., Cunha, M. I. V. A., de Lima, M. P., Palmeira, L., Petrocchi, N., McEwan, K., Maratos, F. A., & Gilbert, P. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263480 · Cited by 93
Emslander, V., & Scherer, R. (2022) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000369 · Cited by 92
Narrative Intervention for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Gillam, S. L., Hartzheim, D., Studenka, B. E., Simonsmeier, V., & Gillam, R. B. (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0295 · Cited by 74
Reporting standards for studies of tailored interventions
Harrington, N. G., & Noar, S. M. (2011) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyr108 · Cited by 73
Bem, D., Tressoldi, P. E., Rabeyron, T., & Duggan, M. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.7177.2 · Cited by 84
Cavicchioli, M., Vassena, G., Movalli, M., & Maffei, C. (2020) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108002 · Cited by 82
Diabetes Self-Management Education: Miles to Go
Klein, H. A., Jackson, S. M., Street, K., Whitacre, J. C., & Klein, G. A. (2013) · Nursing Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2013/581012 · Cited by 78
Measuring Exposure in Hurricane Katrina: A Meta-Analysis and an Integrative Data Analysis
Chan, C. S., & Rhodes, J. E. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092899 · Cited by 77
The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
Pappas, L. N., & Dent, A. L. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z · Cited by 72
Reporting guidance for violence risk assessment predictive validity studies: the RAGEE Statement.
Singh, J. P., Yang, S. M., & Mulvey, E. (2015) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000090 · Cited by 78
Kreuze, L. J., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., de Jonge, Y. B., & Nauta, M. H. (2018) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.10.005 · Cited by 69
Schumm, W. R., Pratt, K. K., Hartenstein, J. L., Jenkins, B. A., & Johnson, G. A. (2013) · Comprehensive Psychology · doi:10.2466/03.cp.2.10 · Cited by 69
What constitutes high quality higher education pedagogical research?
Evans, C., Howson, C. K., Forsythe, A., & Edwards, C. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1790500 · Cited by 98
López-Navarro, E., Del Canto, C., Belber, M., Mayol, A., Fernández-Alonso, O., Lluis, J., Munar, E., & Chadwick, P. (2015) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.016 · Cited by 66
How well is intervention content described in published reports of smoking cessation interventions?
Lorencatto, F., West, R., Stavri, Z., & Michie, S. (2013) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/nts266 · Cited by 65
Gerber, A. S., Arceneaux, K., Boudreau, C., Dowling, C. M., Hillygus, S., Palfrey, T. R., Biggers, D. R., & Hendry, D. J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2014.11 · Cited by 65
Project INTEGRATE: An integrative study of brief alcohol interventions for college students.
Mun, E., The Project INTEGRATE Team, TORRE, J. D. L., Atkins, D. C., WHITE, H. R., Ray, A. E., Kim, S. Y., Jiao, Y., Clarke, N., Huo, Y., et al. (2014) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000047 · Cited by 62
Rossi, J. S. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop202003 · Cited by 64
Kliem, S., & Kröger, C. (2013) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2013.08.005 · Cited by 62
Song, H., Chan, J. S., & Ryan, C. (2024) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/00220221241285006 · Cited by 62
Persisting Issues in Pedagogical Agent Research
Schroeder, N. L., & Gotch, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115597625 · Cited by 61
Goering, D. D., Shimazu, A., Zhou, F., Wada, T., & Sakai, R. (2017) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2017.05.003 · Cited by 80
Applied Psychometrics: Writing-Up a Factor Analysis Construct Validation Study with Examples
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2018.911144 · Cited by 65
Newby, K. V., Teah, G. E., Cooke, R. W. I., Li, X., Brown, K., Salisbury-Finch, B., Kwah, K., Bartle, N. C., Curtis, K., Fulton, E. A., et al. (2019) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1705873 · Cited by 66
Reporting Monte Carlo Studies in Structural Equation Modeling
Boomsma, A. (2013) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.797839 · Cited by 60
Impact of Media Context on Advertising Memory
Kwon, E. S., King, K. W., Nyilasy, G., & Reid, L. N. (2018) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2018-016 · Cited by 59
Church, D., Stapleton, P., Yang, A., & Gallo, F. P. (2018) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000000878 · Cited by 58
Statistical assumptions in L2 research: A systematic review
Hu, Y., & Plonsky, L. (2019) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658319877433 · Cited by 64
Contextual-level unemployment and support for radical-right parties: a meta-analysis
Sipma, T., & Lubbers, M. (2018) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-018-0120-2 · Cited by 60
Guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Rubio-Aparicio, M., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & López-López, J. A. (2018) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.34.2.320131 · Cited by 56
Becker, K. D., & Chorpita, B. F. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2023.2169926 · Cited by 57
Arntz, A., Mensink, K., Cox, W. R., Verhoef, R. E. J., van Emmerik, A. A. P., Rameckers, S. A., Badenbach, T., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291722003634 · Cited by 56
Reporting results from structural equation modeling analyses in Archives of Scientific Psychology.
Hoyle, R. H., & Isherwood, J. C. (2013) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000004 · Cited by 56
Sleep spindles and cognitive performance across adolescence: A meta‐analytic review☆
Reynolds, C. M., Short, M. A., & Gradisar, M. (2018) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.04.003 · Cited by 58
Bem, D., Tressoldi, P. E., Rabeyron, T., & Duggan, M. (2015) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.7177.1 · Cited by 52
Cipriano, C., Naples, L. H., Eveleigh, A., Cook, A., Funaro, M., Cassidy, C., McCarthy, M. F., & Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543221094079 · Cited by 51
Marques, M. M., De Gucht, V., Gouveia, M. J., Leal, I., & Maes, S. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.009 · Cited by 50
Making the Invisible Visible: Guidelines for the Coding Process in Meta-Analyses
Villiger, J., Schweiger, S. A., & Baldauf, A. (2021) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/10944281211046312 · Cited by 50
Garbacz, L. L., Brown, D. M., Spee, G. A., Polo, A. J., & Budd, K. S. (2014) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-014-0166-2 · Cited by 51
Implementation Reporting Recommendations for School-Based Mindfulness Programs
Baelen, R. N., Gould, L. F., Felver, J. C., Schussler, D. L., & Greenberg, M. T. (2022) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-01997-2 · Cited by 49
Fernández-Capo, M., Fernández, S. R., Gámiz, M., Gómez‐Benito, J., & Worthington, E. L. (2017) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000303 · Cited by 49
Recommendations for Reviewing Meta-Analyses in Organizational Research
DeSimone, J. A., Brannick, M. Τ., O’Boyle, E. H., & Ryu, J. W. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120967089 · Cited by 51
Statistical Methods Used in Gifted Education Journals, 2006-2010
Warne, R. T., Lazo, M., Ramos, T., & Ritter, N. L. (2012) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0016986212444122 · Cited by 49
The Impact of APA and AERA Guidelines on effect size reporting
Peng, C.-Y. J., Chen, L.-T., Chiang, H.-M., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9218-2 · Cited by 46
Hudson, B. F., Oostendorp, L. J. M., Candy, B., Vickerstaff, V., Jones, L., Lakhanpaul, M., Bluebond‐Langner, M., & Stone, P. (2016) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216316663856 · Cited by 46
The “other” relationships of self-assessed intelligence: A meta-analysis
Howard, M. C., & Cogswell, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.006 · Cited by 53
Tovmasyan, A., Monk, R. L., & Heim, D. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262670 · Cited by 44
Köhler, T., Landis, R. S., & Cortina, J. M. (2017) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2017.0079 · Cited by 49
More Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends
Lance, C. E. (2011) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428110391814 · Cited by 88
Null Hypothesis Significance Testing,p-values, Effects Sizes and Confidence Intervals
Perdices, M. (2017) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1017/brimp.2017.28 · Cited by 43
Doing a Systematic Review in Health Sciences
Blasco, B. C., Jiménez, R., Gervilla, E., & Moreno, J. J. M. (2020) · Clínica y Salud · doi:10.5093/clysa2020a15 · Cited by 46
Effectiveness of the use of implementation intentions on reduction of substance use: A meta-analysis
Malaguti, A., Ciocanel, O., Sani, F., Dillon, J. F., Eriksen, A., & Power, K. (2020) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108120 · Cited by 48
Lee, J. J., Sanders, T., Antczak, D., Parker, R., Noetel, M., Parker, P. D., & Lonsdale, C. (2021) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654321997918 · Cited by 55
Powell, L., Parker, J. C., Weighall, A., & Harpin, V. (2021) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054721997553 · Cited by 69
Comparing the Ability of MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales to Detect Feigning: A Meta-Analysis
Aparcero, M., Picard, E. H., Nijdam‐Jones, A., & Rosenfeld, B. D. (2022) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911211067535 · Cited by 43
A meta‐analytic review of tipping compensation practices: An agency theory perspective
Banks, G. C., Woznyj, H. M., Kepes, S., Batchelor, J. H., & McDaniel, M. A. (2018) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12261 · Cited by 49
Nelson, G., Carter, H., Boedeker, P., Knowles, E., Buckmiller, C. W., & Eames, J. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231156182 · Cited by 52
Gender differences in alexithymia: Insights from an Updated Meta-Analysis
Mendia, J., Zumeta, L. N., Cusi, O., Pascual, A., Alonso‐Arbiol, I., Gorriti, V. D., & Páez, D. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112710 · Cited by 47
The Efficacy of Psychotherapy: Focus on Psychodynamic Psychotherapy as an Example
Levy, K. N., Ehrenthal, J. C., Yeomans, F. E., & Caligor, E. (2014) · Psychodynamic Psychiatry · doi:10.1521/pdps.2014.42.3.377 · Cited by 40
Kepes, S., & Thomas, M. A. (2018) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2017.1390188 · Cited by 45
Fossum, S., Handegård, B. H., Adolfsen, F., Vis, S. A., & Wynn, R. (2015) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0221-8 · Cited by 44
Single-case experimental research designs.
Kazdin, A. E. (2015) · Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.). · doi:10.1037/14805-029 · Cited by 39
Evaluating Article Search and Selection Procedures in Special Education Literature Reviews
King, S. A., Davidson, K. A., Chitiyo, A., & Apple, D. (2018) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932518813142 · Cited by 43
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
Grant, S., Mayo‐Wilson, E., Hopewell, S., Macdonald, G. M., Moher, D., & Montgomery, P. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9180-5 · Cited by 39
Schalken, N., & Rietbergen, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01395 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards
- Corresponding author
- APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 839-851
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- PMC
- PMC2957094
- OpenAlex
- W2444484626
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD048962)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, research reporting, APA Publication Manual, meta-analysis reporting, intervention evaluation, random assignment, research transparency
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Psychology, Publishing, Research Design, Societies, Scientific, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
