Cited by 1,716Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and BibliometricsDiverse Academic Research Areas

Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach

Cooper, Harris·2017·Sage eBooks

Abstract

Preface to the Fourth Edition Acknowledgments About the Author Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. Step 1: Formulating the Problem Chapter 3. Step 2: Searching the Literature Chapter 4. Step 3: Gathering Information From Studies Chapter 5. Step 4: Evaluating the Quality of Studies Chapter 6. Step 5: Analyzing and Integrating the Outcomes of Studies Chapter 7. Step 6: Interpreting the Evidence Chapter 8. Step 7: Presenting the Results Chapter 9. Conclusion: Threats to the Validity of Research Synthesis Conclusions References Author Index Subject Index

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781071878644

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers conducting evidence synthesis must transform narrative study reports into tabular records before quantitative integration can begin.

    “Researchers conducting evidence synthesis must transform narrative study reports into tabular records before quantitative integration can begin [1,2].”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, H.
Corresponding author
Cooper, Harris
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W1420162645
Cited by
1,716
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 176 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 154 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 41
FWCI
57.19
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Diverse Academic Research Areas
Keywords
evidence synthesis, meta-analysis, literature searching, study quality assessment, evidence integration, threats to validity, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review