Cited by 506Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Maternal depression and the quality of early attachment: an examination of infants, preschoolers, and their mothers

Teti, Douglas M., Gelfand, Donna M., Messinger, Daniel S., Isabella, Russell·1995·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Relations between maternal depression and attachment security among 50 infant-mother and 54 preschool child-mother dyads were examined using the classification system of M.D.S. Ainsworth, M.C. Blehar, E. Waters, and S. Wall (1979) and M. Main and J. Solomon (1990) for infants and the Preschool Assessment (P.M. Crittenden, 1992b) for preschoolers. Attachment insecurity was significantly associated with maternal depression among infants and preschoolers. Futhermore, children without unitary, coherent attachment strategies tended to have more chronically impaired mothers than did children with coherent, organzed attachment strategies. Results stress the importance of severity-chronicity of parental illness in the study of depression and early attachment relations, and that differences between children with and without coherent, organized attachment strategies are as clinically informative as are differences between secure and insecure children

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.31.3.364

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal depression decreases the likelihood of secure attachment and increases the risk for avoidant and disorganized attachment.

    “Research suggests that maternal depression decreases the likelihood of secure attachment and increases the risk for avoidant and disorganized attachment (Martins & Gaffan, 2000;Teti et al. 1995).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teti, D. M., Gelfand, D. M., Messinger, D. S., & Isabella, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
1995-05
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
364-376
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2010288941
Cited by
506
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 21
FWCI
29.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
maternal depression, attachment security, insecure attachment, infant-mother attachment, attachment strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review