Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 493

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Development of Reading in Children Who Speak English as a Second Language.

Lesaux, Nonie K., Siegel, Linda S.·2003·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Patterns of reading development were examined in native English-speaking (L1) children and children who spoke English as a second language (ESL). Participants were 978 (790 L1 speakers and 188 ESL speakers) Grade 2 children involved in a longitudinal study that began in kindergarten. In kindergarten and Grade 2, participants completed standardized and experimental measures including reading, spelling, phonological processing, and memory. All children received phonological awareness instruction in kindergarten and phonics instruction in Grade 1. By the end of Grade 2, the ESL speakers' reading skills were comparable to those of L1 speakers, and ESL speakers even outperformed L1 speakers on several measures. The findings demonstrate that a model of early identification and intervention for children at risk is beneficial for ESL speakers and also suggest that the effects of bilingualism on the acquisition of early reading skills are not negative and may be positive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1017/S0142716499003033 · DOI
  2. August, 1997, Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda.
  3. 10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.429 · DOI
  4. Bialystok, 1999, Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition., 161
  5. Campbell, 1995, Accelerated metalinguistic (phonological) awareness in bilingual children., The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 61, 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00664.x · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.20 · DOI
  7. Chiappe, 2000, Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability., Memory & Cognition, 28, 8, 10.3758/BF03211570 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1006/ceps.1995.1018 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cummins, 1991, Interdependence of first and second language proficiency in bilingual children., 70, 10.1017/CBO9780511620652.006 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2307/747274 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/1170711 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37 · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/0938-8982.00020 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Geva. Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing 12 1 2000 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Geva. The concurrent development of spelling and decoding in two different orthographies. 25 383 1993 · DOI
  16. Geva, 2000, Understanding differences in word recognition skills of ESL children., Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 123, 10.1007/s11881-000-0020-8 · DOI
  17. Gunderson. 1998 · doi:10.3138/9781442675018-019
  18. Hakuta, 1999, The debate on bilingual education., Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 20, 36, 10.1097/00004703-199902000-00006 · doi:10.1097/00004703-199902000-00006
  19. Karlsen, 1994, Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test.
  20. Limbos, 2001, Accuracy of teacher assessments of second-language students at risk for reading disability., Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 136, 10.1177/002221940103400204 · DOI
  21. Lyon, 1995, Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development., Journal of Child Neurology, 10, 120, 10.1177/08830738950100S126 · DOI
  22. Lyon. 2001 · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62096-6
  23. 10.1006/jecp.1994.1028 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Moll, 1985, Ethnographic pedagogy: Promoting effective bilingual instruction., 127
  25. Muter, 1997, The Phonological Abilities Test.
  26. Rosner, 1971, The auditory analysis test: An initial report., Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384, 10.1177/002221947100400706 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1309 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1309 · Paper page
  28. Siegel, 1993, The development of reading., 63
  29. Siegel, 1994, Working memory and reading: A life-span perspective., International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 109, 10.1177/016502549401700107 · DOI
  30. 10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.28 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.28 · Paper page
  31. Snow, 1998, Preventing reading difficulties in young children.
  32. Tabors, 2001, Young bilingual children and early literacy development., 159
  33. Thorndike, 1986, Technical manual: Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale
  34. 10.2307/747596 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Wade-Woolley. The spelling performance of ESL and native speakers of English as a function of reading skill. Reading and Writing 9 387 1997 · DOI
  36. Wilkinson, 1993, The Wide Range Achievement Test 3.
  37. 10.2307/747708 · DOI
  38. Woodcock, 1987, Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised.

Cited by

See all 493

Metadata

Authors
Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1005-1019
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2136677625
Cited by
493
References
4
FWCI
22.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.