Cited by 224Reading and Literacy DevelopmentMultilingual Education and PolicyBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Language-Minority Learners in Special Education: Rates and Predictors of Identification for Services

Samson, Jennifer F., Lesaux, Nonie K.·2009·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort, this study was designed to investigate proportional representation, identification rates, and predictors of language-minority (LM) learners in special education using a nationally representative sample of kindergarten, first graders, and third graders. The findings indicate that although LM learners were underrepresented in special education in kindergarten and first grade, they were overrepresented in third grade across all disability categories. LM status, teacher ratings of language and literacy skills, and reading proficiency level were significant predictors of placement in special education. Kindergarten teacher ratings of language and literacy skills were highly predictive of subsequent placement in special education. The implications for developing a model of early identification, the response-to-intervention model in particular, for LM learners at risk for academic difficulties are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219408326221

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Language minority students are identified later and at higher rates than native English speakers, with underrepresentation in kindergarten and first grade and overrepresentation by third grade.

    “Samson and Lesaux (2009) used the nationally representative dataset ECLS-K to determine that language minority students are identified later and in higher proportions than their native-English-speaking peers, being underrepresented in special education in kindergarten and first grade, but overrepresented by the 3rd grade.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samson, J. F., & Lesaux, N. K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2008-12-10
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
148-162
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2164207710
Cited by
224
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
special education placement, disproportionality, early identification of disabilities, Response to Intervention, reading proficiency, academic difficulties, early childhood education, bilingual education
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dyslexia, Education, Special, Female, Humans, Infant, Language Development Disorders, Learning Disabilities, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mass Screening, Minority Groups, United States, Cohort Studies, Early Intervention, Educational, Multilingualism, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review