Cited by 273Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

Task Switching Across the Life Span: Effects of Age on General and Specific Switch Costs.

Reimers, Stian, Maylor, Elizabeth A.·2005·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The authors investigated age-related changes in executive control using an Internet-based task-switching experiment with 5,271 participants between the ages of 10 and 66 years. Speeded face categorization was required on the basis of gender (G) or emotion (E) in single task blocks (GGG... and EEE...) or switching blocks (GGEEGGEE...). General switch costs, the difference between switching block and single task block performance, decreased during development and then increased approximately linearly from age 18. In contrast, specific switch costs, the difference between switch trial and nonswitch trial performance in the switching block, were more stable across the same age range. These results demonstrate differential age effects in task-switching performance and provide a fine-grained analysis of switch costs from puberty to retirement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.661

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on cognitive flexibility has generally found decreases in switch costs across childhood and adolescence and subsequent increases in older adults.

    “For example, research on cognitive flexibility has used a variety of task switching paradigms and generally found decreases in switch costs (i.e., the extent to which participants slow down on, or in the context of, switch trials) across childhood and adolescence, and subsequent increases in older adults (Cepeda, Kramer, & Gonzalez de Sather, 2001; Crone, Bunge, Van der Molen, & Ridderinkhof, 2006”

    From NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of Executive Function Measures in Adults (2014) · cites this paper as Reimers & Maylor, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reimers, S., & Maylor, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2005
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
661-671
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2023277101
Cited by
273
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
task switching, switch costs, age differences, executive function, cognitive aging, developmental changes, puberty, face classification, emotion recognition, gender classification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Child, Discrimination Learning, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Set, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review