Cited by 433Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism.

Bialystok, Ellen, Craik, Fergus I. M., Ryan, Jennifer·2006·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Two studies are reported that assess differences associated with aging and bilingualism in an executive control task. Previous work has suggested that bilinguals have an advantage over monolinguals in nonlinguistic tasks involving executive control; the major purpose of the present article is to ascertain which aspects of control are sensitive to the bilingual experience. Study 1 used an antisaccade task and found no effects of aging or bilingualism. Study 2 used the identical visual display but coupled to keypress responses. The results showed that bilinguals resolved various types of response conflict faster than monolinguals and that this bilingual advantage generally increased with age. A speculative interpretation of this pattern of results is offered in conclusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1341

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On task-switching tasks, bilinguals typically outperform monolinguals, though the specific components (mixing costs/set shifting vs local switch costs/response switching) vary across studies.

    “Not surprisingly, these tasks are typically performed better by bilinguals than by monolinguals, although the details of those performances are not yet well understood: Some studies report bilingual advantages on mixing costs indicating set shifting [86, 106] while others report the advantage in local switch costs indicating response switching [80,119].”

    From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [106]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Ryan, J.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Rotman Research Institute (CA)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2006
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1341-1354
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2007994902
Cited by
433
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 31
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
executive function, antisaccade task, aging, bilingualism, bilingual advantage, response conflict, keypress response, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Color Perception, Conflict, Psychological, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Saccades, Set, Psychology, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review