Cited by 1,251Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective test of the dual pathway model of bulimic pathology: mediating effects of dieting and negative affect

Stice, Eric·2001·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Because there have been few longitudinal investigations of integrative etiological theories of bulimia nervosa, this study prospectively tested the dual-pathway model using random regression growth curve models and data from a 3-wave community sample of adolescent girls (N = 231). Initial pressure to be thin and thin-ideal internalization predicted subsequent growth in body dissatisfaction, initial body dissatisfaction predicted growth in dieting and negative affect, and initial dieting and negative affect predicted growth in bulimic symptoms. There was prospective evidence for most of the hypothesized mediational effects. Results are consistent with the assertion that pressure to be thin, thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, dieting, and negative affect are risk factors for bulimic pathology and provide support for the dual-pathway model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.124

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Fairburn, 1997, Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention., 209
  2. Fairburn, 1993, The eating disorder examination., 317
  3. Garner, 1988, Relation between anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: Diagnostic implications., 56
  4. 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.140 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0003-066X.41.3.246 · DOI
  6. Wilson, 1996, Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention., 541

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,251

Metadata

Authors
Stice, E.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Stice, Eric
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2001-02
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
124-135
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2097312669
Cited by
1,251
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 76
FWCI
23.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-19908, MH 01708, K01MH001708, T32MH019908)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, dual-pathway model, dieting, negative affect, body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal internalization, adolescent girls, bulimic symptoms, mediation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Body Image, Bulimia, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Models, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Social Conformity, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review