Cited by 71Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Testing the original and the extended dual-pathway model of lack of control over eating in adolescent girls. A two-year longitudinal study

Dakanalis, Antonios, Timko, C. Alix, Carrà, Giuseppe, Clerici, Massimo, Zanetti, M. Assunta, Riva, Giuseppe, Caccialanza, Riccardo·2014·Appetite

Abstract

Stice's (1994, 2001) dual pathway model proposed a mediational sequence that links body dissatisfaction to lack of control over eating through dieting and negative affect. Van Strien et al. (2005) extended the negative affect pathway of the original dual pathway model by adding two additional intervening variables: interoceptive deficits and emotional eating. The purpose of this study was to test and compare the original and extended model using prospective data. Both types of loss of control over eating (i.e., subjective and objective binge eating) were evaluated. Data collected from 361 adolescent girls, who were interviewed and completed self-report measures annually over a 2-year period, were analysed using structural equation modeling. Although both models provided a good fit to the data, the extended model fit the adolescent girls' sample data better and accounted for a greater proportion of variance in binge eating than the original model. All proposed mediational pathways of both models were supported and all indirect effects examined through bootstrap procedure were significant. Although our results confirmed the validity of both models and extended previous findings to an early- to middle adolescent group, the bi-directional relationship between dietary restriction and negative affect suggests that the association between these key risk factors for binge eating are more complex than outlined in both the original and extended dual-pathway models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.022

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 115 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dakanalis, A., Timko, C. A., Carrà, G., Clerici, M., Zanetti, M. A., Riva, G., & Caccialanza, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • University of the Sciences (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT)
Corresponding author
Dakanalis, Antonios
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
82
Pages
180-193
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135512773
Cited by
71
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
dual-pathway model, binge eating, adolescent girls, body dissatisfaction, dieting, negative affect, interoceptive deficits, emotional eating, dietary restriction, eating disorders risk factors, mediation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Diet, Reducing, Eating, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hyperphagia, Italy, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Biological, Models, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Body Mass Index, Caloric Restriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review