Cited by 160Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthNursing care and researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Long-term caregiving: What happens when it ends?

Robinson-Whelen, Susan, Tada, Yuri, MacCallum, Robert C., McGuire, Lynanne, Kiecolt-Glaser, Janice K.·2001·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Data from a longitudinal study were used to examine what happens to caregivers in the years after their cognitively impaired spouse dies. Comparisons of 42 current caregivers, 49 former caregivers, and 52 noncaregivers over a 4-year period showed that former caregivers did not improve on several measures of psychological well-being. Although former caregivers experienced decreases in stress and negative affect, their scores on depression, loneliness, and positive affect did not rebound to levels comparable to noncaregivers and, in fact, remained similar to those of current caregivers up to 3 years after caregiving had ceased. The most consistent predictors of postcaregiving outcomes were social support and intrusive-avoidant thinking about caregiving. The data suggest that some consequences of long-term caregiving may be long-term as well. The needs of former spousal caregivers warrant greater attention both in research and in practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.110.4.573

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Former caregivers' scores on measures of depression and loneliness did not rebound to levels comparable to noncaregivers and remained similar to those of current caregivers up to 3 years after caregiving ceased.

    “we found that former caregivers' scores on measures of depression and loneliness did not ''rebound'' to levels comparable to noncaregivers and, in fact, remained similar to those of current caregivers up to 3 years after caregiving had ceased (23).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson-Whelen, S., Tada, Y., MacCallum, R. C., McGuire, L., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2001-11
Volume
110
Issue
4
Pages
573-584
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2014129467
Cited by
160
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh050538-05, 5k02mh001467-05, 5r37mh042096-15)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG011585, P01-AG 11585)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02 MH01467, R37 MH42096, R01 MH50538)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
spousal caregiving, long-term caregiving, caregiver bereavement, death of a spouse, cognitive impairment, psychological well-being, depression, loneliness, social support, caregiver stress
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Family Health, Female, Humans, Long-Term Care, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Social Support, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review