Cited by 36Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial

LaBrie, Richard A., Peller, Allyson J., LaPlante, Debi A., Bernhard, Bo, Harper, Andrew, Schrier, Thomas, Shaffer, Howard J.·2012·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self-help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling-related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self-help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit's content, or (c) assignment to a wait-list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent-to-treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self-directed resources like this self-help toolkit can assist remediating gambling-related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several self-help interventions have demonstrated their benefits for treating problem gambling and substance use.

    “Several self-help interventions have demonstrated their benefits for treating problem gambling (Labrie et al., 2012; Giroux et al., 2015) and substance use (Carroll et al., 2008; Newman et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
2012-04
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
278-289
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W2169936617
Cited by
36
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • State of Nevada
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO3 DA019705-01A2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
problem gambling, brief intervention, gambling cessation, help-seeking, gambling behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gambling, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Brief, Single-Blind Method, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review