Cited by 95Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementEmployee Performance and Management

Work and leisure: a task attributes analysis

Kabanoff, Boris, O'Brien, Gordon E.·1980·Journal of Applied Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.596

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kabanoff, B., & O'Brien, G. E.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1980-10
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
596-609
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W1978690107
Cited by
95
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
work and leisure, task characteristics, work tasks, leisure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review