The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
Abstract
Schmidt and Hunter (1989) critiqued the within-group interrater reliability statistic (r wg ) described by James, Demaree, and Wolf (1984). Kozlowski and Hattrup (1992) responded to the Schmidt and Hunter critique and argued that r wg is a suitable index of interrater agreement. This article focuses on the interpretation of r wg as a measure of agreement among judges' ratings of a single target. A new derivation of r wg is given that underscores this interpretation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The MPI has been shown to have good construct and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability (8, 21).”
From Empathic and nonempathic interaction in chronic pain couples. (2008) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
Lord, F. M. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056615 · Cited by 5,009
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Self-citationThe Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles
Merrifield, P. R., Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1974) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162145 · Cited by 1,819
Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension.
Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. (1985) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.423 · Cited by 1,344
Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.695 · Cited by 1,136
Response Sets and Test Validity
Cronbach, L. J. (1946) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316444600600405 · Cited by 898
Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments.
Tinsley, H. E. A., & Weiss, D. J. (1975) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076640 · Cited by 883
On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients.
Bartko, J. J. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.762 · Cited by 830
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
Laschinger, H. K. S., Finegan, J., & Wilk, P. (2009) · JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/nna.0b013e3181a23d2b · Cited by 258
“We calculated the rwg, a measure that compares the amount of within-group agreement with a null distribution.(52,53) Because the withingroup agreement was greater than what would be expected by chance (the average rwg for structural empowerment and for LMX quality were 0.”
MethodLin, X., & Germain, R. N. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.348 · Cited by 257
Collective Efficacy: A Multilevel Analysis
Watson, C. B., Chemers, M. M., & Preiser, N. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201278012 · Cited by 257
A FIVE‐YEAR STUDY OF UPWARD FEEDBACK: WHAT MANAGERS DO WITH THEIR RESULTS MATTERS
Walker, A. G., & Smither, J. W. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00166.x · Cited by 257
Volberda, H. W., van der Weerdt, N., Verwaal, E., Stienstra, M., & Verdu, A. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0687 · Cited by 254
“Both the interrater agreement score (James et al. 1993) and the interrater reliability score (Jones et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLeBreton, J. M., Burgess, J. R. D., Kaiser, R. B., Atchley, E. K., & James, L. R. (2003) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428102239427 · Cited by 272
“As James et al. (1993) noted, when these raters are in perfect agreement, SX 2 = 0.”
BackgroundSelf-citationTeam Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams
He, J., Butler, B. S., & King, W. R. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240210 · Cited by 255
A Revised Index of Interrater Agreement for Multi-Item Ratings of a Single Target
Lindell, M. K., Brandt, C. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1999) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466219922031257 · Cited by 255
“Negative values are not a problem for r∗ wg andr∗ wg(J ) if they are accepted as indices of agreement (James et al., 1993; Kozlowski & Hattrup, 1992; Lindell & Brandt, 1997).”
BackgroundThe Shared Leadership Process in Decision-Making Teams
Bergman, J. Z., Rentsch, J. R., Small, E. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, S. M. (2011) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.538763 · Cited by 255
“The level of within-team agreement for intragroup trust, cohesion, task conflict, and socio-emotional conflict were assessed using r wg ( James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1984 ).”
MethodOvercoming Resistance to Change and Enhancing Creative Performance
Hon, A. H. Y., Bloom, M., & Crant, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311415418 · Cited by 254
Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor
Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D., & Haney, M. H. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0458 · Cited by 263
Yan, L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00893.x · Cited by 252
Measuring dimensions of manufacturing flexibility
Koste, L. L., Malhotra, M. K., & Sharma, S. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.001 · Cited by 252
Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity
Elron, E. (1997) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(97)90021-7 · Cited by 251
Data analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions
Castro, S. L. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00105-9 · Cited by 250
Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: Testing a Contingency Model of Executive Controls
Snell, S. A., & Youndt, M. A. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90007-1 · Cited by 246
Organizational injury rate underreporting: The moderating effect of organizational safety climate.
Probst, T. M., Brubaker, T. L., & Barsotti, A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1147 · Cited by 244
Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes
Chang, Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741111183816 · Cited by 252
Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level
Schminke, M. J., Cropanzano, R., & Rupp, D. E. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00034-1 · Cited by 242
Summers, J. K., Humphrey, S. E., & Ferris, G. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0175 · Cited by 256
Somech, A., & Ron, I. (2007) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x06291254 · Cited by 237
Wang, Y.-D., & Hsieh, H.-H. (2012) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726712460706 · Cited by 237
“To justify the aggregation, we calculated the within-group agreement statistic (rwg) (James et al., 1993) for each of the five ethical climates and for each company.”
BackgroundMethodÖlçek Geliştirme Çalışmalarında Kullanılan Kapsam Geçerliği İçin Bir Yol Haritası
Yeşilyurt, S., & Çapraz, C. (2018) · Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17556/erziefd.297741 · Cited by 235
Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams
Chen, M., Chang, Y., & Hung, S. (2007) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00494.x · Cited by 234
Leadership, Collective Personality, and Performance.
Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.509 · Cited by 234
What Drives Key Informant Accuracy?
Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Reimann, M., & Schilke, O. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0174 · Cited by 276
“In addition, although it does not measure reliability in a strict sense (Kozlowski and Hattrup 1992), the rwg(J) agreement index (James, Demaree, and Wolf 1984) offers a heuristic approach to assessing random error (James, Demaree, and Wolf 1993).”
BackgroundStaff burnout and patient satisfaction: Evidence of relationships at the care unit level.
Garman, A. N., Corrigan, P. W., & Morris, S. B. (2002) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.7.3.235 · Cited by 232
“A group was viewed as having adequate level agreement if rwg was greater than .7 ( James et al., 1993 ).”
BackgroundMethodCohen, S. G., Chang, L., & Ledford, G. E. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00909.x · Cited by 230
Masi, R., & Cooke, R. A. (2000) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028909 · Cited by 228
Ling, Q., Lin, M., & Wu, X. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.008 · Cited by 232
van Dolen, W., de Ruyter, K., & Lemmink, J. G. A. M. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00277-1 · Cited by 234
“Empirical justification for aggregation was tested by means of an estimate rWG( J), as suggested by James et al. (1993).”
MethodAubé, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189 · Cited by 275
Predictors of Formal Control Usage in IT Outsourcing Partnerships
Rustagi, S., King, W. R., & Kirsch, L. J. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0169 · Cited by 224
“The r wg scores for cost of the outsourcing arrangement and the current duration of the outsourcing arrangement were 0.76 and 0.71, respectively, which are within acceptable ranges (James et al. 1993).”
BackgroundInfluentialMartin, J. A. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0515 · Cited by 234
Psychological Ownership: How Having Control Matters
Liu, J., Wang, H., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01028.x · Cited by 220
Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. K. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.227 · Cited by 215
Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Morris, T., & O’Regan, P. (2015) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-10-2013-0155 · Cited by 234
“Results Table 2 presents descriptive statistics, including the means, standard deviations, Rwgs, ICC(1)s, ICC(2)s, correlations, and inter-item reliabilities.”
MethodInfluentialMilitary leadership: A context specific review
Wong, L., Bliese, P. D., & McGurk, D. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.001 · Cited by 219
Somech, A. (2005) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x05279448 · Cited by 250
“A value of .70 or above is suggested as a “good” amount of within-group interrater agreement (James et al., 1993).”
BackgroundThe role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708096639 · Cited by 215
“A value of .70 or above is suggested as “good” with respect to within-group interrater agreement (James et al., 1993).”
Wang, T., Long, L., Zhang, Y., & He, W. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3782-9 · Cited by 238
GALVIN, B. M., WALDMAN, D. A., & BALTHAZARD, P. (2010) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01179.x · Cited by 212
Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation
Brachos, D., Kostopoulos, K. C., Söderquist, K. E., & Prastacos, G. P. (2007) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270710819780 · Cited by 212
“First, the ‘‘interrater agreement score’’ (rwg(j)) (James et al., 1993) was calculated for each variable.”
MethodLüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2007) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8 · Cited by 211
“Following critical analysis by Schmidt and Hunter (1989), it became standard practice to see the rWG as a measure of interrater agreement (James et al., 1993; Kozlowski & Hattrup, 1992).”
MethodCritical success factors for human resource outcomes in Kaizen events: An empirical study
Farris, J. A., Aken, E. M. V., Doolen, T. L., & Worley, J. M. (2008) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.051 · Cited by 224
Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty in buyer–supplier new product development
Yan, T., & Dooley, K. J. (2013) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.10.001 · Cited by 212
“To assess inter-rater reliability and agreement, we computed the mean of item-level inter-rater correlations, within-group inter-rater reliabilities rwg (James et al., 1993), and intraclass correlation coefficients ICC(1) and ICC(2) (Bliese, 2000).”
Collective Efficacy and Team Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Collegiate Football Teams.
Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., & Short, S. E. (2004) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.126 · Cited by 210
THE SOURCES AND ACCURACY OF JOB APPLICANTS' BELIEFS ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE.
Cable, D. M., Aiman‐Smith, L., Mulvey, P. W., & Edwards, J. R. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556336 · Cited by 210
Empowerment in the Hospitality Industry: an Exploration of Antecedents and Outcomes
Sparrowe, R. T. (1994) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/109634809401700306 · Cited by 209
Employment relationships and firm performance: evidence from an emerging economy
Wang, D., Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Y., & Ma, L. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.213 · Cited by 208
Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure
Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Guo, W. (2019) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006 · Cited by 224
PREVIOUS WORK EXPERIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIALIZATION: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION.
Adkins, C. L. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256748 · Cited by 208
Ilieș, R., Wagner, D. T., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1140 · Cited by 208
“Therefore, we set out to determine if there was a reasonable level of agreement within teams by computing an index of interrater agreement (rwg; James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1993 ).”
Moon, H. K., Kamdar, D., Mayer, D. M., & Takeuchi, R. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.84 · Cited by 211
The Relation of School Structure and Social Environment to Parent Involvement in Elementary Schools
Griffith, J. E. (1998) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461916 · Cited by 219
Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: the roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration
Chen, M., Lin, H., & Michel, J. G. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.891 · Cited by 207
Cliff, J. E., Jennings, P. D., & Greenwood, R. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.010 · Cited by 205
Wu, P., & Chaturvedi, S. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308331097 · Cited by 221
Linking learning and effective process implementation to mass customization capability
Huang, X., Kristal, M. M., & Schroeder, R. G. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.002 · Cited by 206
Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2010) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320903272083 · Cited by 244
“Average rwg(j) values of .70 and above are indicative of sufficient agreement level to suggest shared climates within teams (James et al., 1993).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLin, H., & McDonough, E. F. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2010.2092781 · Cited by 205
Adaptive versus Proactive Behavior in Service Recovery: The Role of Self-Managing Teams
de Jong, A., & de Ruyter, K. (2004) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.0011-7315.2004.02513.x · Cited by 222
Offshoring and firm innovation: The moderating role of top management team attributes
Mihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J. P., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1983 · Cited by 201
Recruiters’ Perceptions and Use of Applicant Résumé Information: Screening the Recent Graduate
Cole, M. S., Rubin, R. S., Feild, H. S., & Giles, W. F. (2007) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00288.x · Cited by 200
The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams
Huang, R., Kahai, S. S., & Jestice, R. J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.014 · Cited by 201
Liu, S., Hu, J. J., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Lin, X. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.006 · Cited by 228
Kidwell, R. E., Mossholder, K. W., & Bennett, N. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300605 · Cited by 357
Team Virtues and Performance: An Examination of Transparency, Behavioral Integrity, and Trust
Palanski, M. E., Kahai, S. S., & Yammarino, F. J. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7 · Cited by 202
“The rwg statistic (James et al., 1993) is calculated by comparing the observed group variance to an expected random variance and is useful for analyzing the variance within a single group.”
MethodThe occurrences and correlates of bullying and harassment in the restaurant sector
Mathisen, G. E., Einarsen, S. V., & Mykletun, R. J. (2008) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00602.x · Cited by 208
Schippers, M. C., Homan, A. C., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1784 · Cited by 199
Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.681 · Cited by 196
How Authentic Leadership Influences Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Team Reflexivity
Lyubovnikova, J., Legood, A., Turner, N., & Mamakouka, A. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2692-3 · Cited by 239
THE ROLE OF RELATIONAL TRUST IN BANK--SMALL FIRM RELATIONSHIPS.
Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159589 · Cited by 222
Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. (2004) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601103257412 · Cited by 202
RETRACTED: Impact of spiritual leadership on unit performance
Fry, L. W., Hannah, S. T., Noel, M., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.002 · Cited by 219
RetractedLiu, Y., Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Perrewé, P. L., Weitz, B., & Xu, J. (2007) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.003 · Cited by 192
Tesluk, P. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.200 · Cited by 194
Small, E. E., & Rentsch, J. R. (2010) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000017 · Cited by 205
Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028958 · Cited by 219
Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022101032005005 · Cited by 189
Bronkhorst, B. (2015) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2015.09.002 · Cited by 229
Earley, P. C. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2863 · Cited by 190
Marr, J. C., & Thau, S. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0909 · Cited by 200
Glisson, C. A., Green, P., & Williams, N. J. (2012) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.06.002 · Cited by 193
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., & Gavin, J. H. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1375 · Cited by 190
Walumbwa, F. O., LAWLER, J. J., Avolio, B. J., Wang, P., & Shi, K. (2005) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190501100301 · Cited by 186
Organizational climate, services, and outcomes in child welfare systems
Glisson, C., & Green, P. (2011) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.04.009 · Cited by 185
Epitropaki, O. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1793 · Cited by 184
An Empirical Study of System Improvement by Frontline Employees in Hospital Units
Tucker, A. L. (2007) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.1060.0156 · Cited by 186
“outlined by James and colleagues (James et al. 1993).”
Flowing Together: A Longitudinal Study of Collective Efficacy and Collective Flow Among Workgroups
Salanova, M., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & Cifré, E. (2014) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.2013.806290 · Cited by 208
Treatment Errors in Healthcare: A Safety Climate Approach
Naveh, E., Katz-Navon, T., & Stern, Z. (2005) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0372 · Cited by 169
“We tested for the homogeneity of responses by calculating the Rwg coefficients of homogeneity (James et al. 1984) of the four dimensions for each of the participating medical units.”
MethodHeavey, C., Şimşek, Z., Roche, F., & Kelly, A. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00858.x · Cited by 181
Lorinkova, N., & Perry, S. J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314560411 · Cited by 207
Development and validation of safety climate scales for lone workers using truck drivers as exemplar
Huang, Y.-H., Zohar, D. M., Robertson, M. M., Garabet, A., Lee, J., & Murphy, L. A. (2012) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.011 · Cited by 187
“70 (James et al., 1993); ICC(1) > .”
BackgroundInfluentialPredictors of Community Therapists’ Use of Therapy Techniques in a Large Public Mental Health System
Beidas, R. S., Marcus, S. C., Aarons, G. A., Hoagwood, K., Schoenwald, S. K., Evans, A. C., Hurford, M. O., Hadley, T. R., Barg, F. K., Walsh, L., et al. (2015) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3736 · Cited by 193
Guest, D. E., Sanders, K., Rodrigues, R., & Oliveira, T. C. (2020) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12326 · Cited by 189
Tourigny, L., Han, J., Baba, V. V., & Pan, P. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3745-6 · Cited by 195
“Then, we computed Rwg(j) statistic (James 1982; James et al. 1993) and ICC(2) to demonstrate acceptable within groups or inter-rater agreement (Klein and Kozlowski 2000).”
BackgroundMethodVariation in caregiver perceptions of teamwork climate in labor and delivery units
Sexton, J. B., Holzmueller, C. G., Pronovost, P. J., Thomas, E. J., McFerran, S., Nunes, J., Thompson, D. A., Knight, A. P., Penning, D. H., & Fox, H. E. (2006) · Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211556 · Cited by 175
When organizational climate is unambiguous, it is also strong.
Dickson, M. W., Resick, C. J., & Hanges, P. J. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.351 · Cited by 175
“We calculated index rwg(j)s (i.e., within-group interrater agreement for scales with j essentially parallel items; L. R. James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1984, 1993 ) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ICC(1) and ICC(2) to determine whether there was statistical evidence to justify aggregation of individual respons…”
MethodChatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.16928415 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-309
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2022950201
- Cited by
- 2,221
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 108 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 110 · 2012: 96
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- inter-rater reliability, interobserver agreement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review