The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
Abstract
Schmidt and Hunter (1989) critiqued the within-group interrater reliability statistic (r wg ) described by James, Demaree, and Wolf (1984). Kozlowski and Hattrup (1992) responded to the Schmidt and Hunter critique and argued that r wg is a suitable index of interrater agreement. This article focuses on the interpretation of r wg as a measure of agreement among judges' ratings of a single target. A new derivation of r wg is given that underscores this interpretation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The MPI has been shown to have good construct and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability (8, 21).”
From Empathic and nonempathic interaction in chronic pain couples. (2008) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
Lord, F. M. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056615 · Cited by 5,009
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Self-citationThe Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles
Merrifield, P. R., Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1974) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162145 · Cited by 1,819
Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension.
Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. (1985) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.423 · Cited by 1,344
Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.695 · Cited by 1,136
Response Sets and Test Validity
Cronbach, L. J. (1946) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316444600600405 · Cited by 898
Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments.
Tinsley, H. E. A., & Weiss, D. J. (1975) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076640 · Cited by 883
On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients.
Bartko, J. J. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.762 · Cited by 830
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tsai, W. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069443 · Cited by 4,352
THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159573 · Cited by 3,951
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 · Cited by 3,705
“We calculated an interrater agreement score (rwg) for data on these variables (James et al. 1993).”
MethodAnswers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106296642 · Cited by 3,608
“Schmidt and Hunter (1989) critiqued the rWG and rWGðJÞ indices, largely based on semantic confusion arising from earlier writers’ labels of the rWG indices as reliability coefficients (James et al., 1984) versus agreement coefficients (James et al., 1993; Kozlowski & Hattrup, 1992).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhat's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096 · Cited by 3,297
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069293 · Cited by 2,775
(2000) · Cited by 2,531
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, MANUFACTURING STRATEGY, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE.
Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., J. W. DEAN, Jr., & Lepak, D. P. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256714 · Cited by 2,274
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756 · Cited by 2,269
“[58] developed indices appropriate for within-group agreement for a set of raters rating a single target with a single item (rwg(1)) or multiple-item scale (rwg(J)).”
BackgroundManaging Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizational Antecedents Matter?
Jansen, J. J. P., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.19573106 · Cited by 2,326
Lubatkin, M., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306290712 · Cited by 2,230
“We also used an interrater reliability coefficient developed by James, Demaree, and Wolf (1993) to examine the intragroup reliability (rwg) of responses.”
MethodServant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,058
The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria: What Did They Really Say?
Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428105284919 · Cited by 2,053
“…the interpretation of rwg as an IRR coefficient; Kozlowski and Hattrup (1992) argued that rwg is properly interpreted as an IRA index, not an IRR coefficient; James, Demaree, and Wolf (1993) concurred; and rwg is now more widely (and correctly) interpreted as an IRA index, not an IRR coefficient.”
BackgroundTsai, W. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 · Cited by 1,960
“For nonrelational data (such as centralization), I used the methods prescribed by James et al. (1984, 1993) to calculate interrater agreement (see e.g., Kozlowski and Hattrup (1992) for a further discussion on the measure of interrater agreement).”
MethodRauch, A., & Fresé, M. (2007) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701595438 · Cited by 1,879
“We only analysed traits that showed high interrater agreement (James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1993 ).”
MethodAvolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W. L., & Bhatia, P. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.283 · Cited by 1,702
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
BEYOND SELF-MANAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF TEAM EMPOWERMENT.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256874 · Cited by 2,110
An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models
Hofmann, D. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300602 · Cited by 1,681
Zohar, D. M. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587 · Cited by 1,559
Sun, L., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525821 · Cited by 1,506
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069328 · Cited by 1,594
Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751 · Cited by 1,382
Patterson, M., West, M. A., Shackleton, V., Dawson, J., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., & Wallace, A. M. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.312 · Cited by 1,318
“The within-group agreement index of multiple item scales developed by James, Demaree, and Wolf (1984, 1993) is a technique for assessing agreement among the judgments made on a single variable in regard to a single target.”
MethodIntellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns*
Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. (2004) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00435.x · Cited by 1,280
“To make certain the data could be aggregated to the organizational level, Rwg, or interrater agreement, was calculated for each of the variables according to the procedures prescribed by James et al. (1993) .”
MethodMorgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893935 · Cited by 1,224
Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry
Shrout, P. E. (1998) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029800700306 · Cited by 1,211
Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · Cited by 1,689
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451 · Cited by 1,152
“Finally, rwg was used to assess internal agreement within a team for each variable, ranging from 0 (no agreement) to 1 (complete agreement) (James, Demaree, and Wolf, 1993).”
MethodHofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170 · Cited by 1,091
“Both Katz and Kahn (1978) and Graen (1976) suggested that individuals accomplish work in organizations by engaging in roles that are expected of them by other individuals within the organization.”
BackgroundDOES DECISION PROCESS MATTER? A STUDY OF STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING EFFECTIVENESS.
Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256784 · Cited by 1,071
Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta‐analytic review
Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altmann, R. A., Lacost, H. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.198 · Cited by 1,079
Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0538 · Cited by 1,331
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2003) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeg112 · Cited by 958
Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism
Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D. M., & Crossan, M. M. (2008) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008 · Cited by 959
“We calculated an inter-rater agreement score (rwg) for each variable (James et al., 1993).”
MethodSchaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022625 · Cited by 933
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159571 · Cited by 889
MONKEY SEE, MONKEY DO: THE INFLUENCE OF WORK GROUPS ON THE ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR OF EMPLOYEES.
Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256963 · Cited by 872
A CROSS‐LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING UNSAFE BEHAVIORS AND ACCIDENTS
Hofmann, D. A., & Stetzer, A. (1996) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01802.x · Cited by 838
Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0665 · Cited by 918
“For this subset, we calculated the coefficient of agreement (rwg5 (James et al. 1984, 1993).”
MethodAPPLICANT PERSONALITY, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND ORGANIZATION ATTRACTION
Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00912.x · Cited by 830
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2008) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002 · Cited by 898
“The two sets of codings were compared to examine inter-rater agreement (James et al., 1993) and the results revealed a strong mean agreement of .82 across the variables used in this study, with no specific variable scoring lower than .67.”
BackgroundMethodZohar, D. M. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.130 · Cited by 819
Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002 · Cited by 820
A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior
Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556657 · Cited by 786
The cross‐level effects of culture and climate in human service teams
Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.162 · Cited by 758
Self-citationRecalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio
Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175612440286 · Cited by 731
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.3.401 · Cited by 688
“This coefficient has been offered as a means of "assessing agreement among the judgements made by a single group of judges on a single variable in regard to a single target" (James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1984, as cited in James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1993 ) and represents the proportional reduction in error variance relative to…”
MethodEMPLOYEE SILENCE ON CRITICAL WORK ISSUES: THE CROSS LEVEL EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105.x · Cited by 714
Gerhart, B. A., Wright, P. M., MAHAN, G. C. M., & Snell, S. A. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02418.x · Cited by 679
Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312457417 · Cited by 679
Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25750708 · Cited by 697
Human Resource Configurations, Intellectual Capital, and Organizational Performance.
Youndt, M. A., & Snell, S. A. (2004) · Journal of managerial issues · Cited by 654
Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology
Anderson, N. R., Öneş, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 632
Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research
James, L. R., Choi, C. C., Ko, C.-H. E., McNeil, P. K., Minton, M. K., Wright, M. A., & Kim, K. (2008) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701662550 · Cited by 691
“They questioned the theoretical basis of rwg(j) (James et al., 1984, 1993), which is an index of agreement among judges’ ratings of a single target on multiple items.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLing, Y., Şimşek, Z., Lubatkin, M., & Veiga, J. F. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.32626023 · Cited by 623
Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity
Tiwana, A. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.666 · Cited by 640
“Before such aggregation can be done, it is necessary to assess within-project interrater agreement using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (James, Demaree, and Wolf, 1993).”
MethodInfluentialComposition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality.
Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62 · Cited by 619
Glisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., Green, P., & The Research Network on Youth Mental Health (2008) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5 · Cited by 608
Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x · Cited by 613
The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/20159573 · Cited by 636
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.409 · Cited by 595
Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.09.002 · Cited by 594
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/3069328 · Cited by 583
Jong, B. A. D., & Elfring, T. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.51468649 · Cited by 616
Taggar, S. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069349 · Cited by 834
Organizational climate and company productivity: The role of employee affect and employee level
Patterson, M. G., Warr, P. B., & West, M. A. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317904774202144 · Cited by 575
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(00)00065-3 · Cited by 592
“Originally developed as a measure of within team reliability, James et al. (1993) noted that it was really a measure of within team agreement.”
BackgroundAn empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance
Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00060-5 · Cited by 642
The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma
Zu, X., Fredendall, L. D., & Douglas, T. J. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.02.001 · Cited by 585
“70 (James et al., 1993), and the AD values range from 0.”
BackgroundLiao, H., & Rupp, D. E. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242 · Cited by 563
Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., & Farahnak, L. R. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-45 · Cited by 559
“We next examined the average agreement within clinical work group for individual items and scales using awg(1) and awg(J), respectively [48-50].”
BackgroundMethodLindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.331 · Cited by 570
Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: A leadership-based intervention model.
Zohar, D. M. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.156 · Cited by 550
Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0692 · Cited by 567
Zohar, D. M., & Luria, G. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.322 · Cited by 561
“Homogeneity of climate perceptions was assessed with rwg (James et al., 1993), intraclass correlation (ICC[1]), and reliability of the mean (ICC[2]; James, 1982; Shrout & Fleiss, 1979).”
MethodApplying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership
Dyer, N., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009 · Cited by 538
Gibson, C. B. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257089 · Cited by 532
“The James et al. (1984) within-group agreement (rwJ) of the ratings was .”
BackgroundToo real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces
MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C.-C., & Koch, C. T. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026 · Cited by 533
Authentic Leadership and Positive Psychological Capital
Clapp‐Smith, R., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Avey, J. B. (2008) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051808326596 · Cited by 551
Totterdell, P. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.848 · Cited by 525
Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.295 · Cited by 550
Gaba, D. M., Howard, S. K., Flanagan, B. T., Smith, B. E., Fish, K. J., & Botney, R. (1998) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199807000-00005 · Cited by 512
Work team trust and effectiveness
Costa, A. C. (2003) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480310488360 · Cited by 569
Yule, S., Flin, R. H., Maran, N., ROWLEY, D. I., Youngson, G. G., & Paterson‐Brown, S. (2008) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-z · Cited by 507
Chou, C.-J. (2013) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.001 · Cited by 544
Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation
Somech, A., & Drach‐Zahavy, A. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310394187 · Cited by 545
“A value of .70 or above is suggested as a “good” amount of within-group interrater agreement (James et al., 1993).”
BackgroundKaptein, M. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.520 · Cited by 522
“The goodness-of-fit index (GFI), as developed by Jöreskog and Sörbom (1985; 1993), indicates how well the observed covariance matrix of the analyzed items is reproduced by the estimated covariance matrix. Values larger than 0.9 are required for good-fitting models. As the GFI is sensitive to the number of estimated pa…”
MethodInfluentialTu, Y., & Lu, X. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1455-7 · Cited by 528
“In this study, the rwg were 0.714 for group ethical leadership and 0.785 for intrinsic motivation, both of which were above the critical value of 0.70 and suggested as good with respect to within-group agreement (James et al. 1993).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAbusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance
Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.721 · Cited by 468
Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process
Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2002) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0957-4174(02)00038-6 · Cited by 466
“the extent to which raters make the same ratings ( James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1993 ).”
BackgroundOn Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement
Burke, M. J., Finkelstein, L. M., & Dusig, M. S. (1999) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819921004 · Cited by 462
“We refer readers interested in comparisons of other interrater agreement and interrater reliability indices to George and James (1993) and James et al. (1984, 1993).”
BackgroundMethodPirola‐Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.240 · Cited by 460
Griffith, J. E. (2004) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/09578230410534667 · Cited by 503
Innovativeness in family firms: a family influence perspective
Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F. (2010) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9268-5 · Cited by 459
The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes
Schminke, M. J., Ambrose, M. L., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.006 · Cited by 455
Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s Guide
Burke, M. J., & Dunlap, W. P. (2002) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428102005002002 · Cited by 448
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2010) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00435.x · Cited by 461
Gong, Y., Law, K. S., Chang, S., & Xin, K. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013116 · Cited by 447
Li, Q., Maggitti, P. G., Smith, K. G., Tesluk, P. E., & Katila, R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0844 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-309
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2022950201
- Cited by
- 2,221
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 108 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 110 · 2012: 96
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- inter-rater reliability, interobserver agreement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review