Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis.
Abstract
Recently, F. J. Yammarino and S. E. Markham (1992) summarized the basic within and between analysis (WABA) approach, applied it to data previously collected and reported on by J. M. George (1990), and used this application to critique George's findings. After briefly reviewing the theoretical underpinnings of George, the authors discuss several points of confusion in Yammarino and Markham's article in regard to the determination of the appropriateness of aggregation and the existence of relations between variables at the group level of analysis. The authors then discuss several short-comings in Yammarino and Markham's description of WABA, including the failure to consider Person × Situation interactions in the basic WABA equation and misinterpretations of comparisons of the within component to the between component in WABA
Cites (2)
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response biasJames, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional statesWatson, David, Clark, Lee A. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (10)
- What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive SuiteCohen, Susan G., Bailey, Diane E. · 1997 · Journal of Management
- Untitled work2000
- How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down modelMayer, David M., Kuenzi, Maribeth, Greenbaum, Rebecca, Bardes, Mary, Salvador, Rommel (Bombie) · 2009 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A SimulationBliese, Paul D. · 1998 · Organizational Research Methods
- Evidence of mood linkage in work groupsTotterdell, Peter, Kellett, Steve, Teuchmann, Katja, Briner, Rob B. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.78.5.798
- The paper
- George, J. M., & James, L. R. (1993). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.5.798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.