Cited by 505

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings.

Viswesvaran, Chockalingam, Ones, Deniz S., Schmidt, Frank L.·1996·Journal of Applied Psychology

DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
Self-citation
Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study.
Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.487 · Cited by 860
Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90037-t · Cited by 807
SELF-REGULATION FOR MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE ROLE OF ACTIVE FEEDBACK SEEKING.
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256442 · Cited by 774
Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.199 · Cited by 567
Self-citation
An empirical test of the man-in-the-middle hypothesis among executives in a hierarchical organization employing a unit-set analysis
Graen, G., Dansereau, F., & Minami, T. (1972) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(72)90050-5 · Cited by 42

Show all 8 references

Sorted by citations

The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262 · Cited by 4,180
Self-citation
Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106296642 · Cited by 3,608
Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765 · Cited by 3,190
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
Poropat, A. E. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014996 · Cited by 2,729
Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160 · Cited by 2,356
Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751 · Cited by 1,382
How Important are Job Attitudes? Meta-Analytic Comparisons of Integrative Behavioral Outcomes and Time Sequences
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786077 · Cited by 1,245
The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392 · Cited by 1,224
An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021212 · Cited by 1,059
A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects
GILBOA, S., SHIROM, A., FRIED, Y., & COOPER, C. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x · Cited by 1,072
Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes
Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.003 · Cited by 929
Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research
Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7 · Cited by 631
A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance.
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.162 · Cited by 639
Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta analysis
Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.181 · Cited by 573
Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta‐Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships
Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H., & Fraley, R. C. (2015) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12072 · Cited by 572
The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies.
Riketta, M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472 · Cited by 547
Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives
Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033901 · Cited by 482
Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings
SAROGLOU, V., PICHON, I., TROMPETTE, L., VERSCHUEREN, M., & DERNELLE, R. (2005) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x · Cited by 449
A meta-analytic examination of work and general locus of control.
Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017707 · Cited by 292
Theory testing and measurement error
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1999) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(99)00024-0 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4 · Cited by 250
The Impact of Faking on Employment Tests: Does Forced Choice Offer a Solution?
Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1304_3 · Cited by 233
High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness.
Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.4.215 · Cited by 233
Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2015.106 · Cited by 230
The robust reliability of neuropsychological measures: meta-analyses of test-retest correlations
Calamia, M., Markon, K., & Tranel, D. (2013) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.809795 · Cited by 207
A century of research on conscientiousness at work
Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1908430116 · Cited by 215
The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies
Salgado, J. F., & Táuriz, G. (2014) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.716198 · Cited by 205
Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance.
SCHMIDT, F. L., SHAFFER, J. A., & OH, I. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.x · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence.
Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000415 · Cited by 194
Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta‐review
van de Ridder, J. M. M., McGaghie, W. C., Stokking, K. M., & ten Cate, O. T. J. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12744 · Cited by 154
Obtaining Unbiased Results in Meta-Analysis: The Importance of Correcting for Statistical Artifacts
Wiernik, B. M., & Dahlke, J. A. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919885611 · Cited by 135
The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., & Tauriz, G. (2015) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12098 · Cited by 138
Increasing Validity with Forced-Choice Criterion Measurement Formats
Bartram, D. (2007) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00386.x · Cited by 132
Work climate and the mediating role of workplace bullying related to job performance, job satisfaction, and work ability: A study among hospital nurses
Olsen, E., Bjaalid, G., & Mikkelsen, A. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13337 · Cited by 128
Agreeableness and Its Consequences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings
Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683211073007 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Does the Job Satisfaction—Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Yim, F. H. K. (2009) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109339208 · Cited by 123
Developments in the Criterion–related Validation of Selection Procedures: A Critical Review and Recommendations for Practice
VAN IDDEKINGE, C. H., & PLOYHART, R. E. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00133.x · Cited by 101
Comparing personality test formats and warnings: Effects on criterion-related validity and test-taker reactions
Converse, P. D., Oswald, F. L., Imus, A., Hedricks, C., Roy, R., & Butera, H. (2008) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00420.x · Cited by 78
The effect of rater accountability on performance ratings: a meta-analytic review
Harari, M. B., & Rudolph, C. W. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.007 · Cited by 38
Criterion-related validity of forced-choice personality measures: A cautionary note regarding Thurstonian IRT versus Classical Test Theory scoring
Fisher, P., Robie, C., Christiansen, N., Speer, A., & Schneider, L. (2019) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2019.01.003 · Cited by 31
Convergent and Predictive Validity of the Big Five Factors Assessed with SingleStimulus and Quasi-Ipsative Questionnaires
Otero, I., Cuadrado, D., & Martínez, A. (2020) · Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones · doi:10.5093/jwop2020a17 · Cited by 16

Authors: Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L.
ORCID: Ones, Deniz S.
Venue: Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1996-10
Volume: 81
Issue: 5
Pages: 557-574
ISSN: 1939-1854
0021-9010
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557
Cited by: 505
References: 8
Language: en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Record

About these checks