Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict: Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan.
Abstract
This article integrates theory from the cognitive tradition in negotiation with theory on culture and examines cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict. The authors predicted that although there may be universal (etic) dimensions of conflict construals, there also may be culture-specific (emic) representations of conflict in the United States and Japan. Results of multidimensional scaling analyses of U.S. and Japanese conflict episodes supported this view. Japanese and Americans construed conflicts through a compromise versus win frame (R. L. Pinkley, 1990), providing evidence of a universal dimension of conflict construal. As the authors predicted, Japanese perceived conflicts to be more compromise-focused, as compared with Americans. There were also unique dimensions of construal among Americans and Japanese (infringements to self and giri violations, respectively), suggesting that identical conflict episodes are perceived differently across cultures.
Cites (6)
- The Ecological Approach to Visual PerceptionBornstein, Marc H., Gibson, James J. · 1980 · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
- The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.Triandis, Harry C. · 1989 · Psychological Review
- Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).Forgas, Joseph P. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
- Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and PerformancePelled, Lisa Hope, Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Xin, Katherine R. · 1999 · Administrative Science Quarterly
- Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan.Kitayama, Shinobu, Markus, Hazel Rose, Matsumoto, Hisaya, Norasakkunkit, Vinai · 1997 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflictThompson, Leigh, Loewenstein, George · 1992 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Cited by (14)
- Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research AgendaTepper, Bennett J. · 2007 · Journal of Management
- The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender-Diverse GroupsNishii, Lisa H. · 2013 · Academy of Management Journal
- Cross-Cultural Organizational BehaviorGelfand, Michele J., Erez, Miriam, Aycan, Zeynep · 2007 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Personality Correlates of the Four-Factor Model of Cultural IntelligenceAng, Soon, Van Dyne, Linn, Koh, Christine · 2006 · Group & Organization Management
- How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizationsConnelly, Catherine E., Zweig, David · 2015 · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict: Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1059
- The paper
- Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Holcombe, K. M., Dyer, N., Ohbuchi, K.-I., & Fukuno, M. (2001). Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict: Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.