The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unwrapping the organizational entry process: Disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment.
Abstract
This 4-wave longitudinal study of newcomers in 7 organizations examined preentry knowledge, proactive personality, and socialization influences as antecedents of both proximal (task mastery, role clarity, work group integration, and political knowledge) and distal (organizational commitment, work withdrawal, and turnover) indicators of newcomer adjustment. Results suggest that preentry knowledge, proactive personality, and socialization influences from the organization, supervisors, and coworkers are independently related to proximal adjustment outcomes, consistent with a theoretical framework highlighting distinct dimensions of organizational and work task adjustment. The proximal adjustment outcomes partially mediated most of the relationships between the antecedents of adjustment and organizational commitment, work withdrawal, and turnover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885 · cited 2×
“Tests developed by Grambsch and Therneau (1994) showed that the proportional hazards assumption was violated, 2(24, N 822) 46.38, p .01, but stratifying the baseline hazard by gender and ethnicity resolved the nonproportionality problem, 2(22, N 822) 22.76, p .42.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Proactive Behavior in Organizations
Crant, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600304 · Cited by 2,701
Cited by
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438 · Cited by 1,948
Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045 · Cited by 780
Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature
Fuller, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008 · Cited by 688
Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033901 · Cited by 482
Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees.
Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2011) · APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization. · doi:10.1037/12171-002 · Cited by 370
GREGURAS, G. J., & DIEFENDORFF, J. M. (2010) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01180.x · Cited by 201
Physical workplace adjustments to support neurodivergent workers: A systematic review
Weber, C., Krieger, B., Häne, E., Yarker, J., & McDowall, A. (2024) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12431 · Cited by 86
Reverse mentoring, job crafting and work-outcomes: the mediating role of work engagement
Garg, N., Murphy, W., & Singh, P. (2021) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/cdi-09-2020-0233 · Cited by 57
Zheng, Y., Zheng, X., Wu, C.-H., Yao, X., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103519 · Cited by 52
Legault, L., & Amiot, C. E. (2014) · Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_8 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Wanberg, C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 779-794
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2152138096
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 18.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
