CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26Social and Intergroup PsychologyMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The Role of Autonomy in Intergroup Processes: Toward an Integration of Self-Determination Theory and Intergroup Approaches

Legault, Lisa, Amiot, Catherine E.·2014·Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_8

Cites

129 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People whose self-esteem is high are often motivated to use their personal strengths to benefit their ingroup.

    “Moreover, people whose self-esteem is high are often motivated to use their personal strengths to benefit their ingroup (Amiot & Sansfaçon, 2011;Jans, Postmes, & Van der Zee, 2011;Legault & Amiot, 2014).”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Legault & Amiot, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. de la Sablonnière, R., Amiot, C. E., Cardenas, D., Sadykova, N., & Gorborukova, G. L. (under review). Identity integration: A subtractive process. European Journal of Social Psychology.
  2. Doucerain, M., Amiot, C. E., Mireault, M., & Ryder, A. G. (2012). Acculturation et intégration des identités culturelles multiples à Montréal (Acculturation and multiple cultural identity integration in Montreal). Talk presented at the conference of the Société québécoise pour la recherche en psychologie, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada.
  3. Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. New York: Norton.
  4. Jung, C. G. (1959). Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of self (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. Legault, L., & Upal, A. (2012). Group identity integration: Its motivational antecedents and intergroup consequences. Poster presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology’s Group Processes and Intergroup Relations Pre-Conference, San Diego, CA.
  6. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Legault, L., & Amiot, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Clarkson University (US)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Legault, Lisa
ORCID
Venue
Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published
2014
Pages
159-190
DOI
10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_8
OpenAlex
W1019006704
Semantic Scholar
136352a93e185dd410638627cfcdda1df6264ec6
Cited by
26
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
10.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-determination theory, intergroup processes, autonomy, outgroup attitudes, prejudice, autonomy support, social control, intergroup tension, group identity, need satisfaction, integration, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review