The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emotional Display Rules and Emotional Labor: The Moderating Role of Commitment.
Abstract
The authors examined whether commitment to emotional display rules is a necessary condition for emotional display rules to affect behavior at work. Results using structural equation modeling revealed that display rule commitment moderated the relationships of emotional display rule perceptions with surface acting, deep acting, and positive affective delivery at work, such that the relationships were strong and positive when commitment to display rules was high and weak when commitment to display rules was low. These findings suggest that motivation plays a role in the emotional labor process in that individuals must be committed to display rules for these rules to affect behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents of Commitment to Difficult Goals
Hollenbeck, J. R., Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.18 · Cited by 563
Cited by
Emotional Labor at a Crossroads: Where Do We Go from Here?
Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. S. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111400 · Cited by 664
Groth, M., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.44634116 · Cited by 580
The Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests
Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.008 · Cited by 486
Pugh, S. D., Groth, M., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021395 · Cited by 350
Relationships between emotional labor, job performance, and turnover
Goodwin, R. E., Groth, M., & Frenkel, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.001 · Cited by 258
Chen, Z., Sun, H., Lam, W., Hu, Q., Huo, Y., & Zhong, J. A. (2012) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.579918 · Cited by 143
Grandey, A. A., Chi, N., & Diamond, J. A. (2013) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12037 · Cited by 136
Affectivity, Emotional Labor, Emotional Exhaustion, and Emotional Intelligence in Coaching
Lee, Y. H., & Chelladurai, P. (2016) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2015.1092481 · Cited by 107
Hong, D., & Kim, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265581 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Gosserand, R. H., & Diefendorff, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1256-1264
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2003009185
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
