The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels.
Abstract
The authors measured perceptions of safety climate, motivation, and behavior at 2 time points and linked them to prior and subsequent levels of accidents over a 5-year period. A series of analyses examined the effects of top-down and bottom-up processes operating simultaneously over time. In terms of top-down effects, average levels of safety climate within groups at 1 point in time predicted subsequent changes in individual safety motivation. Individual safety motivation, in turn, was associated with subsequent changes in self-reported safety behavior. In terms of bottom-up effects, improvements in the average level of safety behavior within groups were associated with a subsequent reduction in accidents at the group level. The results contribute to an understanding of the factors influencing workplace safety and the levels and lags at which these effects operate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Reason, J. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139062367 · Cited by 5,108
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Personality, affect, and behavior in groups
George, J. M. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.107 · Cited by 1,372
Cited by
Clarke, S. (2013) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x · Cited by 483
Law, R., Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2011) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.010 · Cited by 448
Safety climate and beyond: A multi-level multi-climate framework
Dov, Z. (2008) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.03.006 · Cited by 377
Safety climate and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Towards the prediction of unsafe behavior
Fogarty, G. J., & Shaw, A. (2010) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.008 · Cited by 295
Explained variance measures for multilevel models
LaHuis, D. M., Hartman, M. J., Hakoyama, S., & Clark, P. C. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114541701 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 946-953
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2075873207
- Cited by
- 1,706
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 37.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
- The paper
- Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
