The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours
Abstract
A theoretical model of safety leadership, which incorporated both transformational and active transactional leadership styles, was tested using meta‐analytic path analysis. The final model showed that transformational leadership had a positive association with both perceived safety climate and safety participation, with perceived safety climate partially mediating the effect of leadership on safety participation. Active transactional leadership had a positive association with perceived safety climate, safety participation and safety compliance. The effect of leadership on safety compliance was partially mediated by perceived safety climate and the effect on safety participation fully mediated by perceived safety climate. The findings suggest that active transactional leadership is important in ensuring compliance with rules and regulations, whereas transformational leadership is primarily associated with encouraging employee participation in safety. Therefore, in line with the augmentation hypothesis of leadership, a combination of both transformational and transactional styles appeared to be most beneficial for safety. Avenues for further research and practical implications in terms of leadership training and development are discussed. Practitioner Points: Developed and tested a model of safety leadership, which shows that both transformational and active transactional leadership styles are important aspects of effective safety leadership. Study has implications for practitioners who are involved with the design of leadership training and development programmes, as such programmes should be tailored to focus on a range of leader behaviours that encompass active transactional as well as transformational style. Findings suggest that leadership styles have a differential effect on safety compliance and safety participation – thus, training and development programmes should make specific links between leader behaviours and their subsequent influence on employee behaviour.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ongoing participation in learning to develop safer human behaviours and practices around horses in variable environments is likely to promote more frequent safety-first behaviours and choices.
“Ongoing participation in learning to develop safer human behaviours and practices around horses in variable environments, is likely to promote more frequent safety-first behaviours and choices [148].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [148]
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330 · cited 1×
“Model fit was assessed using chi-squared goodness-of-fit test, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger, 1990), Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI; Tucker & Lewis, 1973), normed fit index (NFI; Bentler & Bonett, 1980) and comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990).”
MethodHunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
IMPACT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP ON FOLLOWER DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE: A FIELD EXPERIMENT.
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069307 · Cited by 1,906
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 153
- 10.1016/S0022‐4375(02)00071‐3 · DOI
- Arbuckle J. L., 2005, Amos 6.0 user's guide
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021‐9010.87.3.488 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.81.6.827 · DOI · Paper page
- Bass B. M., 1985, Leadership and performance beyond expectations
- Bass B. M., 1995, MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire for research
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.88.2.207 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0013161X04269862 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033‐2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- 10.1080/13669870903346386 · DOI
- 10.1016/0001‐4575(86)90019‐9 · DOI
- Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 445
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.06.002 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037720 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0016172 · DOI
- 10.1080/02678370903416679 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076‐8998.11.4.315 · DOI
- 10.1108/00483480610670580 · DOI
- 10.1348/096317909X452122 · DOI
- Clarke S., 2008, The effects of transformational leadership on perceived safety climate – A longitudinal study, Journal of Occupational Health and Safety – Australia and New Zealand, 24, 237
- 10.1111/j.1539‐6924.2006.00824.x · DOI
- 10.1037/a0014247 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0025101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1177/1548051810366712 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076‐8998.2.4.304 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169‐8141(94)00075‐E · DOI
- 10.1037//1076‐8998.5.1.127 · DOI
- Dekker S., 2008, Just culture: Balancing safety and accountability
- 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/0950‐4230(94)80067‐7 · DOI
- 10.2307/255538 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.017 · DOI
- Evans D. D., 2005, Relationships between organisational climates and safety‐related events at four wood manufacturers, Forest Products Journal, 55, 23
- 10.1179/oeh.2000.6.1.18 · DOI
- Fleishman E. A., 1955, Leadership and supervision in industry
- 10.1016/S0925‐7535(00)00012‐6 · DOI
- Fogarty G. J., 2005, Psychological strain mediates the impact of safety climate on maintenance errors, International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 5, 53
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.008 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021296 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.83.4.565 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021731 · DOI
- Garavan T. N., 2001, An investigation into the relationship between safety climate and safety behaviours in Irish organisations, Irish Journal of Management, 22, 141
- 10.1016/0196‐6553(95)90067‐5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022‐4375(02)00002‐6 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01102.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475‐6773.2005.00401.x · DOI
- Glendon A. I., 2006, Human safety and risk management
- 10.1080/02678370310001616144 · DOI
- 10.1016/1048‐9843(95)90036‐5 · DOI · Paper page
- Griffin M. A. &Talati Z.(2011).Meta‐analysis of active management‐by‐exception variability across leadership contexts. Presented at Academy of Management annual conference San Antonio TX August 2011.
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0274(199909)36:1+<122::AID‐AJIM43>3.0.CO;2‐L · DOI
- 10.1007/s10111‐008‐0119‐y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0193945907311322 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0019528 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022‐4375(98)00011‐5 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.84.2.286 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.88.1.170 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744‐6570.1996.tb01802.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.020 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028448.01394.bf · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.023 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0019380 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0037511 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.017 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.89.5.755 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.88.2.246 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.016 · DOI
- 10.1108/09526860710822716 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076‐8998.11.1.76 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.74.4.546 · DOI
- LaPorte T., 1991, Working in practice but not in theory: The theoretical challenges of ‘high‐reliability organisations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 19
- 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182100bf7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0925‐7535(00)00007‐2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.001 · DOI
- Locke E. A., 1990, A theory of goal setting and task performance
- 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.004 · DOI
- MacCallum R. C., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications
- 10.1016/j.trf.2004.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1093/intqhc/mzn003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1080/02678379808256864 · DOI
- 10.1080/026783701102678370110066616 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9364(2002)128:5(375) · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9364(2003)129:1(80) · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.011 · DOI
- 10.1348/096317908X325313 · DOI
- 10.1080/02678373.2011.569200 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021484 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.91.4.946 · DOI
- 10.1061/S0925‐7535(00)00008‐4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.93.3.632 · DOI
- 10.1016/0001‐4575(94)90066‐3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1037//1076-8998.6.3.211 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/1048‐9843(90)90009‐7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1076‐8998.9.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00011‐2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009 · DOI
- Reason J. T., 1997, Managing the risks of organisational accidents
- 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365‐2834.2009.00971.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0022‐4375(95)00015‐I · DOI
- 10.1177/108602668900300202 · DOI · Paper page
- Schneider B., 1983, Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives, 106
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0001‐4575(03)00016‐2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.008 · DOI
- Sobel M. E., 1982, Sociology methodology, 290
- 10.1111/j.1365‐2834.2010.01181.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467‐9450.2006.00548.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trf.2008.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475‐6773.2006.00570.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.jom.0000167275.13079.8d · DOI
- 10.1037/1076‐8998.13.4.319 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021004 · DOI
- Vroom V. H., 1964, Work and motivation
- 10.1177/105960119001500404 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744‐6570.2006.00046.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869‐004‐2230‐2 · DOI
- Weick K., 2001, Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity
- Weick K. E., 1999, Research in organisational behaviour, 81
- 10.1016/S0925‐7353(97)00020‐9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.05.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1177/1059601110390936 · DOI
- Yukl G., 1998, Leadership in organisations
- 10.1016/S1048‐9843(99)00013‐2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0019835 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.65.1.96 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.587 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.130 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021‐9010.89.2.322 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1464‐0597.2010.00421.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, S.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Business School University of Manchester UK
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-28
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-49
- ISSN
- 0963-1798
- 2044-8325
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review