CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 914Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Violence and BullyingEmployee Performance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model.

Aryee, Samuel, Chen, Zhen Xiong, Sun, Li-Yun, Debrah, Yaw A.·2007·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors examined antecedents of abusive supervision and the relative importance of interactional and procedural justice as mediators of the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes of affective organizational commitment and individual- and organization-directed citizenship behaviors. Data were obtained from subordinate-supervisor dyads from a telecommunication company located in southeastern China. Results of moderated regression analysis revealed that authoritarian leadership style moderated the relationship between supervisors' perceptions of interactional justice and abusive supervision such that the relationship was stronger for supervisors high rather than low in authoritarian leadership style. In addition, results of structural equation modeling analysis revealed that subordinates' perceptions of interactional but not procedural justice fully mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes. Implications for future investigations of abusive supervision are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tedeschi, J. T., & Norman, N. (1985). A social psychological interpretation of displaced aggression. In E. J.Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 29–56). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 911

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2007-01
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
191-201
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
DOI
10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
OpenAlex
W2067939158
Cited by
914
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 51
FWCI
37.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
abusive supervision, interactional justice, procedural justice, authoritarian leadership, affective commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, mediation
MeSH terms
Authoritarianism, Employment, Female, Humans, Leadership, Male, Personnel Management, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Justice, Organizational Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review