CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 244Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

If you feel bad, it’s unfair: A quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions

Barsky, Adam, Kaplan, Seth A.·2007·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.286
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Whereas research interest in both individual affect/temperament and organizational justice has grown substantially in recent years, affect's role in the perception of organizational justice has received scant attention. Here, the authors integrate these literatures and test bivariate relationships between state affect (e.g., moods), trait affect (e.g., affectivity), and organizational justice variables using meta-analytically aggregated effect sizes. Results indicated that state and trait positive and negative affect exhibit statistically significant relationships with perceptions of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice in the predicted directions, with mean population-level correlations ranging in absolute magnitude from M(rho) = .09 to M(rho) = .43. Correlations involving state affect generally were larger but not significantly different from those involving trait affect. Finally, the authors propose ideas for investigations at the primary-study level.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.286

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 127 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover among hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  2. *Ryan, J. J. (1998). Testing moral reasoning and the Protestant work ethic as determinants of organizational citizenship behaviors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 3A.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–244 of 244

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Barsky, A., & Kaplan, S. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • George Mason University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2007-01
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
286-295
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
DOI
10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.286
OpenAlex
W2053416004
Cited by
243
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
affect, organizational justice, state affect, trait affect, positive affect, negative affect, distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, mood, affectivity
MeSH terms
Affect, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Social Justice, Social Perception, Organizational Culture, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review