CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 353Family and Disability Support ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observed and perceived parental overprotection in relation to psychosocial adjustment in preadolescents with a physical disability: The mediational role of behavioral autonomy

Holmbeck, Grayson N., Johnson, Sharon Z., Wills, Karen E., McKernon, Wendy, Rose, Brigid, Erklin, Shannon, Kemper, Therese·2002·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.70.1.96
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to tes a mediational model of associations between parental overprotectiveness (OP), behavioral autonomy. and psychosocial adjustment in 68 families with 8- and 9-year-old preadolescents with spipa bifida and a demographically matched sample of 68 families with able-bodied children. Measures included questionnaire and observational assessments of parental OP; parent and child reports of behavioral autonomy; and parent, child, and teacher reports of preadolescent adjustment. On the basis of both questionnaire and observational measures of OP, mothers and fathers of children with spina bifida were significantly more overprotective than their counterparts in the able-bodied sample, although this group difference was partially mediated by children's cognitive ability. Across samples, mothers were more likely to be overprotective than fathers. Both questionnaire and observational measures of parental OP were associated with lower levels of preadolescent decision-making autonomy as well as with parents being less willing to grant autonomy to their offspring in the future. For the questionnaire measure of OP, and only for the spina bifida sample. the mediational model was supported such that parental OP was associated with less behavioral autonomy, which was, in turn, associated with more externalizing problems. Findings are discussed in relation to the literature on parenting, autonomy development, and pediatric psychology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.70.1.96

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Anderson, 1993, Family context and compliance behavior in chronically ill children., 77
  2. Becker, 1964, Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline., Vol. 1, 169
  3. Bell, 1964, The effect on the family of a limitation in coping ability in the child: A research approach and a finding., Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 10, 129
  4. Dunn, 1981, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test--Revised.
  5. Harter, 1985, Manual for Self-Perception Profile for Children: Revision of the Perceived Competence Scale for Children.
  6. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599 · DOI
  7. Holmbeck, 1995, Parenting adolescents., Vol. 1, 91
  8. Johnson, 1995, Manual for OP coding system. Unpublished manual
  9. Kazak, 1995, The role of families and other systems in pediatric psychology research and practice., 84
  10. Kovacs, 1992, Children's Depression Inventory--manual.
  11. Levy, 1970, The concept of maternal overprotection., 387
  12. McLone, 1998, An introduction to spina bifida.
  13. Silverberg, 1996, Autonomy in adolescence: A contextualized perspective., 12
  14. Suen, 1989, Analyzing qunatitative behavioral observational data.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 353

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Holmbeck, G. N., Johnson, S. Z., Wills, K. E., McKernon, W., Rose, B., Erklin, S., & Kemper, T.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
ORCID
Holmbeck, Grayson N.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2002
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
96-110
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.70.1.96
OpenAlex
W2135416944
Cited by
353
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
parental overprotection, behavioral autonomy, psychosocial adjustment, preadolescents, spina bifida, physical disability, externalizing problems, cognitive ability, gender differences in parenting, mediation, decision-making autonomy, parenting
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Social Adjustment, Spinal Dysraphism, Parenting, Observation, Children with Disabilities, Disabled Children, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review