Cited by 396Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Impact of puberty on family relations: Effects of pubertal status and pubertal timing.

Steinberg, Laurence·1987·Developmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.451

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinberg, L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Steinberg, Laurence
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
1987-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
451-460
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2015066348
Cited by
386
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
puberty, family relationships, pubertal stage, pubertal timing, adolescent development, family dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review