Cited by 152Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The role of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in the positive illusory bias.

Owens, Julie Sarno, Hoza, Betsy·2003·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The present study examined the relationships among gender, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, depressive symptoms, and biases in perceptions of scholastic competence in children. Participants were 38 children with predominantly inattentive symptoms (IA), 59 children with predominantly hyperactive/impulsive symptoms or a combination of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention (HICB), and 83 control (CTL) children. HICB children overestimated their scholastic competence more than IA children when reading and math achievement scores were used as criteria and more than CTL children when math achievement and teacher perceptions of children's competence were used as criteria. IA children generally did not differ from CTL children with regard to estimations of competence. Regression analyses suggested that positive illusory self-perceptions are associated with more severe hyperactivity/impulsivity, but not more severe inattention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.680

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that children with ADHD found the task easier is in line with research demonstrating that children with ADHD often have distorted self-perceptions of competence.

    “This finding is in line with research demonstrating that children with ADHD often have distorted self-perceptions of competence (e.g., Owens & Hoza, 2003).”

    From Implementation Intentions Facilitate Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD (2008) · cites this paper as Owens & Hoza, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owens, J. S., & Hoza, B.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
680-691
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2028697248
Cited by
152
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, scholastic competence, self-perception, children, gender differences, depressive symptoms, teacher perceptions, academic performance
MeSH terms
Affect, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Illusions, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review