Cited by 176Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Site matters: Multisite randomized trial of motivational enhancement therapy in community drug abuse clinics.

Open access
Ball, Samuel A., Martino, Steve, Nich, Charla, Frankforter, Tami L., Van Horn, Deborah, Crits-Christoph, Paul, Woody, George E., Obert, Jeanne L. +2 more·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The effectiveness of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) in comparison with counseling as usual (CAU) for increasing retention and reducing substance use was evaluated in a multisite randomized clinical trial. Participants were 461 outpatients treated by 31 therapists within 1 of 5 outpatient substance abuse programs. There were no retention differences between the 2 brief intervention conditions. Although both 3-session interventions resulted in reductions in substance use during the 4-week therapy phase, MET resulted in sustained reductions during the subsequent 12 weeks whereas CAU was associated with significant increases in substance use over this follow-up period. This finding was complicated by program site main effects and higher level interactions. MET resulted in more sustained substance use reductions than CAU among primary alcohol users, but no difference was found for primary drug users. An independent evaluation of session audiotapes indicated that MET and CAU were highly and comparably discriminable across sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.4.556

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Farentinos C, Obert JL. CTN Motivational Enhancement Treatment manual. 2000 Unpublished manuscript. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewin Group. Practice research and evaluation networks: Summary of professions providing substance abuse treatment services. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller WR, Zweben A, DiClemente CC, Rychtarik RG. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series: Vol. 2. Motivational Enhancement Therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence (DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 92–1894) Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  4. Project MATCH Research Group. Therapist effects in three treatments for alcohol problems. Psychotherapy Research. 1998;8:455–474. [Google Scholar]
  5. Singer JD, Willet JB. Methods from applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen J, editors. Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biological methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 1992. pp. 41–72. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, S. A., Martino, S., Nich, C., Frankforter, T. L., Van Horn, D., Crits-Christoph, P., Woody, G. E., Obert, J. L., Farentinos, C., & Carroll, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Matrix Institute on Addictions (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2007-08
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
556-567
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1976355116
Cited by
176
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (U10 DA13038, U10 DA13043, U10 DA13045)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
motivational enhancement therapy, addiction treatment, substance use reduction, brief intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Motivation, Retention, Psychology, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review