Cited by 122Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Shapes of early change in psychotherapy under routine outpatient conditions

Stulz, Niklaus, Lutz, Wolfgang, Leach, Chris, Lucock, Mike, Barkham, Michael·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Although improvement of clients' state is a central concern for psychotherapy, relatively little is known about how change in outcome variables unfolds during psychotherapy. Client progress may follow highly variable temporal courses, and this variation in treatment courses may have important clinical implications. By analyzing treatment progress using growth mixture modeling up to the 6th session in a sample of 192 outpatients treated under routine clinic conditions, the authors identified 5 client groups based on similar progress on the short form versions of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure. The shapes of early change typical for these client groups were characterized by (a) high initial impairment, (b) low initial impairment, (c) early improvement, (d) medium impairment with continuous treatment progress, or (e) medium impairment with discontinuous treatment progress. Moreover, the shapes of early change were associated with different treatment outcomes and durations, and several intake variables (depression, anxiety, and age) enabled prediction of the shape of early change and/or prediction of individual treatment progress within client groups with similar shapes of change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.6.864

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stulz, N., Lutz, W., Leach, C., Lucock, M., & Barkham, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2007-12
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
864-874
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2031325170
Cited by
122
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (PP001-102651)
  • United Kingdom's National Health Service (NYRO ACJ)
  • NHS
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychotherapeutic change, early changes, growth mixture modeling, treatment outcome prediction, treatment duration, depression, anxiety, age
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review