Cited by 99Social and Intergroup PsychologyCounseling Practices and SupervisionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Race, Color-Blind Racial Attitudes, and Judgments About Mental Health: A Shifting Standards Perspective.

Gushue, George V.·2004·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

A fictitious counseling center intake report was given to a sample of 158 White graduate students in counseling and clinical psychology to examine the impact of reported client race (Black or White) on perceptions of clients' symptom severity. As predicted by the shifting standards model of social judgment (M. Biernat, M. Manis, & T. E. Nelson, 1991), participants judged the Black target to be significantly less symptomatic than the White target. After controlling for social desirability (measured as motivation to respond without prejudice; E. A. Plant & P. G. Devine, 1998), a significant interaction effect showed that color-blind racial attitudes (H. A. Neville, R. L. Lilly, G. Duran, R. M. Lee, & L. Browne, 2000) were positively related to symptom perception for the Black target but not the White target. The shift in assessment (rating the Black target more favorably than an identical White target) was more evident for participants with lower levels of color-blind attitudes. Implications for counseling and future research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.398

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.387 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-0167.47.2.165 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1019 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Carter, 1995, The influence of race and racial identity in psychotherapy: Toward a racially inclusive model.
  8. 10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.456 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-0167.47.2.155 · DOI
  10. Constantine, 2001, New visions for defining and assessing multicultural counseling competence., 482
  11. D'Andrea, 2001, Expanding our thinking about White racism: Facing the challenge of multicultural counseling in the 21st century., 289
  12. D'Andrea, 1991, Evaluating the impact of multicultural counseling training., Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 143, 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01576.x · DOI
  13. 10.1089/104454601750143528 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.835 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fleck, 2002, Differential prescription of maintenance antipsychotics to African American and White patients with new-onset bipolar disorder., The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63, 658, 10.4088/JCP.v63n0802 · DOI
  16. Gaertner, 1986, The aversive form of racism., 61
  17. 10.1037/0022-0167.47.2.199 · DOI
  18. Helms, 1990, Toward a model of White racial identity development., 49
  19. Helms, 1995, An update of Helms's White and people of color racial identity models., 181
  20. Jaccard, 1990, Interaction effects in multiple regression.
  21. Lopez, 1983, The study of psychotherapy bias: Some conceptual issues and some concluding comments., 353
  22. McConahay, 1986, Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale., 91
  23. 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.59 · DOI
  24. Neville, 2001, Race, power and multicultural counseling psychology: Understanding White privilege and color-blind attitudes., 257
  25. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811 · DOI
  26. 10.1006/jesp.2001.1478 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ponterotto, 1995, Development and initial validation of the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI)., Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 1016, 10.1177/0013164495055006011 · DOI
  28. Ponterotto, 2001, Handbook of multicultural counseling
  29. Ponterotto, 2002, A revision of the Multicultural Counseling Awareness Scale., Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 30, 153, 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2002.tb00489.x · DOI
  30. Reynolds, 1982, Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale., Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119, 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1037/0022-0167.41.2.137 · DOI
  32. Sue, 2003, Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice
  33. Sue, 1992, Multicultural counseling competences and standards: A call to the profession., Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 20, 64, 10.1002/j.2161-1912.1992.tb00563.x · DOI
  34. Sue, 1998, Multicultural counseling competencies: Individual and organizational development., 10.4135/9781452232027 · DOI
  35. Sue, 2003, Understanding abnormal behavior
  36. Taylor, 1981, A categorization approach to stereotyping., 88
  37. 10.1016/0883-9417(92)90032-E · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gushue, G. V.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Gushue, George V.
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2004-10
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
398-407
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2072309408
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
social judgment, perceived symptom severity, Black clients, social desirability, counselor perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review