CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8,332Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.

Pintrich, Paul R., De Groot, Elisabeth V.·1990·Journal of Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A correlational study examined relationships between motivational orientation, self-regulated learning, and classroom academic performance for 173 seventh graders from eight science and seven English classes. A self-report measure of student self-efficacy, intrinsic value, test anxiety, self-regulation, and use of learning strategies was administered, and performance data were obtained from work on classroom assignments. Self-efficacy and intrinsic value were positively related to cognitive engagement and performance. Regression analyses revealed that, depending on the outcome measure, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and test anxiety emerged as the best predictors of performance. Intrinsic value did not have a direct influence on performance but was strongly related to self-regulation and cognitive strategy use, regardless of prior achievement level. The implications of individual differences in motivational orientation for cognitive engage-ment and self-regulation in the classroom are discussed. Self-regulation of cognition and behavior is an important aspect of student learning and academic performance in the classroom context (Corno & Mandinach, 1983; Corno & Rohrkemper, 1985). There are a variety of definitions of self-regulated learning, but three components seem especially important for classroom performance. First, self-regulated learning includes students ' metacognitive strategies for plan-ning, monitoring, and modifying their cognition (e.g., Brown,

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8,332

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1990-03
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
33-40
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
DOI
10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
OpenAlex
W2106760415
Cited by
8,332
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 267 · 2025: 364 · 2024: 390 · 2023: 427 · 2022: 402 · 2021: 420 · 2020: 444 · 2019: 421 · 2018: 404 · 2017: 404 · 2016: 447 · 2015: 450 · 2014: 432 · 2013: 388 · 2012: 372
FWCI
26.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spencer Foundation
  • National Academy of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
student self-regulation, academic motivation, self-efficacy, intrinsic value, test anxiety, metacognitive strategies, cognitive engagement, seventh grade students, individual differences in motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review