Cited by 444Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning.

Mautone, Patricia D., Mayer, Richard E.·2001·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

In 3 experiments, students received a short science lesson on how airplanes achieve lift and then were asked to write an explanation (retention test) and to write solutions to 5 problems, such as how to design an airplane to achieve lift more rapidly (transfer test). For some students, the lesson contained signals, including a preview summary paragraph outlining the 3 main steps involved in lift, section headings, and pointer words such as because or as a result. The signaling did not add any additional content information about lift but helped clarify the structure of the passage. Students who received signaling generated significantly more solutions on the transfer test than did students who did not receive signaling when the explanation was presented as printed text (Experiment 1), spoken text (Experiment 2), and spoken text with corresponding animation (Experiment 3). Results are consistent with a knowledge construction view of multimedia learning in which learners seek to build mental models of cause-and-effect systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.377

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mautone and Mayer (2001) found students receiving lesson with signals performed significantly better in problem-solving than those who did not.

    “Results suggested that students receiving the lesson with signals performed significantly better in the problem-solving task than those who did not.”
  • Signaling in a narrated animation was only effective when both animation and narration were signaled, not when only one was signaled.

    “Furthermore, Mautone and Mayer (2001, Experiment 3) investigated the effect of signaling in a narrated animation and found that signaling was only effective when both the animation and the narration were signaled (signaled words were spoken with a slower, deeper intonation), but not when only the animation or the narration was signaled.”

    From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Mautone and Mayer 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2001-06
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
377-389
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2054045882
Cited by
444
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
signaling, cognitive guidance, multimedia learning, knowledge construction, mental models, transfer of learning, text structure, spoken text, animation, science instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review