Cited by 900Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEmotions and Moral Behavior

Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test.

Pekrun, Reinhard, Elliot, Andrew J., Maier, Markus A.·2006·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

A theoretical model linking achievement goals to discrete achievement emotions is proposed. The model posits relations between the goals of the trichotomous achievement goal framework and 8 commonly experienced achievement emotions organized in a 2 (activity/outcome focus) × 2 (positive/negative valence) taxonomy. Two prospective studies tested the model in German and American college classrooms. The results were largely in line with the hypotheses. Mastery goals were positive predictors of enjoyment of learning, hope, and pride and were negative predictors of boredom and anger. Performance-approach goals were positive predictors of pride, whereas performance-avoidance goals were positive predictors of anxiety, hopelessness, and shame. The results were consistent across studies and robust when controlled for gender, GPA, social desirability, temperament, and competence expectancy. The research is discussed with regard to the underdeveloped literature on achievement emotions and with regard to the motivation and emotion research domains more broadly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance-avoidance goals have been systematically linked to anxiety, hopelessness, shame, low ability-related self-esteem, and pretask threat appraisals, and negatively related to self-determination, perceptions of control, and feeling calm during evaluations.

    “Performanceavoidance goals, on the other hand, have been systematically linked to anxiety, hopelessness, shame (Pekrun, Elliot, & Maier, 2006), low ability-related self-esteem, and pretask threat appraisals and negatively related to self-determination, perceptions of control, and feeling calm during evaluations (Elliot & McGregor, 2001; McGregor & Elliot, 2002).”

    From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Pekrun, Elliot, & Maier, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2006-08
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
583-597
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2152550197
Cited by
900
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 55
FWCI
27.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bavarian State Ministry of Sciences, Research and the Arts
  • Humboldt Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
achievement goals, achievement emotions, mastery goals, performance-approach goals, performance-avoidance goals, joyful learning, boredom, hope, hopelessness, pride, shame, anxiety, anger, emotional valence, emotion and motivation, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review