Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior.

Abstract

Social perceivers process selected aspects of the stimulus array presented by another person. This article argues that such selectivity is based on the informativeness of person attributes. Properties of the attribute itself—its evaluative extremity (distance from the scale midpoint) and its evaluative valence (positive or negative)—can make it informative. Informative attributes attract selective attention at input and also carry extra weight in the final impression. In the present research, negativity and extremity were manipulated across two separate behavioral dimensions, sociability and civic activism, and over 16 stimulus persons. Perceivers saw two prescaled behavior photographs for each stimulus person and controlled a slide changer switch—this provided a measure of attention as looking time. Perceivers also rated each stimulus person's likability, providing a measure of relative weight for each slide. Weights were derived from Anderson's information integration model. Perceivers preferentially weighted behaviors that were extreme or negative, and the behavioral measure of attention (looking time) replicated the predicted pattern. The results are discussed in light of controversies over the rationality of social information processing.

Cites (4)

1. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
   Zajonc, R. B. · 1980 · American Psychologist
2. On the psychology of prediction.
   Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1973 · Psychological Review
3. From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
   Jones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E. · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
4. Stigma, staring, and discomfort: A novel-stimulus hypothesis
   Langer, Ellen J., Fiske, Susan, Taylor, Shelley E., Chanowitz, Benzion · 1976 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Show all 4 references

Cited by (61)

1. Bad Is Stronger Than Good
   Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, Vohs, Kathleen D. · 2001 · Review of General Psychology
2. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.
   Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter, Xu, Jun · 2002 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
   Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J.C., Glick, Peter · 2007 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
4. Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
   Rozin, Paul, Royzman, Edward B. · 2001 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
5. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events – the mobilization minimization hypothesis.
   Taylor, Shelley E. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 1,533