The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Abstract
Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. A meta-analysis of 78 studies demonstrates that social loafing is robust and generalizes across tasks and S populations. A large number of variables were found to moderate social loafing. Evaluation potential, expectations of co-worker performance, task meaningfulness, and culture had especially strong influence. These findings are interpreted in the light of a Collective Effort Model that integrates elements of expectancy-value, social identity, and self-validation theories. Many of life's most important tasks can only be accomplished in groups, and many group tasks are collective tasks that require the pooling of individual members' inputs. Government task forces, sports teams, organizational committees, symphony orchestras, juries, and quality control teams provide but a few examples of groups that combine individual efforts to form a single product. Because collective work settings are so pervasive and indispensable, it is important to determine which factors motivate and demotivate individuals within these collective contexts. Intuition might lead to the conclusion that working with others should inspire individuals to maximize their potential and work especially hard. Research on social loafing, however, has revealed that individuals frequently exert less effort on collective tasks than on individual tasks. Formally, social loafing is the reduction in motivation and effort when individuals work collectively compared with when they work individually or coactively. When working collectively, individuals work in the real or imagined presence of others with whom they combine their inputs to form a single group product. When working coactively, individuals work in the real or imagined presence of others, but their inputs are not combined with the inputs of others. Determining the conditions under which individuals do or do not engage in social loafing is a problem of both theoretical and practical importance. At a practical level, the identification of moderating variables may
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Group work also increases the probability of social loafing, the tendency for individuals to demonstrate less effort when working collectively than when working individually (Karau and Williams, 1993).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Karau and Williams, 1993
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,583
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
(1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,439
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,003
Taking a free ride: How team learning affects social loafing.
Gabelica, C., Mæyer, S. D., & Schippers, M. C. (2021) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000713 · Cited by 49
Corporate sponsorships may hurt nonprofits: Understanding their effects on charitable giving
Bennett, C. M., Kim, H., & Loken, B. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.010 · Cited by 42
Saving water at Cape Town schools by using smart metering and behavioral change
Visser, M., Booysen, M. J., Brühl, J., & Berger, K. J. E. (2021) · Water Resources and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.wre.2020.100175 · Cited by 42
Beránek, P. (2005) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2000.926604 · Cited by 41
Human factors in requirements engineering:
Viller, S., Bowers, J., & Rodden, T. A. (1999) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(98)00049-6 · Cited by 41
Humphrey, S. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., Meyer, C. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2011) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00778.x · Cited by 45
Natural Learning in Higher Education
Armstrong, & Scott, J. (2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_302725 · Cited by 41
Making Environmental Communications Meaningful to Female Adolescents
Lee, K. (2008) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547008324364 · Cited by 40
Meslec, N., & Curșeu, P. L. (2013) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496413491988 · Cited by 40
Charbonnier, E., Huguet, P., Bräuer, M., & Monteil, J. (1998) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.1998.26.4.329 · Cited by 39
Effects of Feedback on Student Behavior in Cooperative Learning Groups in a Grade 7 Math Class
Ross, J. A. (1995) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461818 · Cited by 39
Wong, A. S. H., Tjosvold, D., & Su, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.468 · Cited by 39
The Impact of Conflict and Conflict Management Style on Deadbeats and Deserters in Virtual Teams
Furumo, K. (2008) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2008.440 · Cited by 39
Antecedents of team innovation in health care teams
Moser, K. S., Dawson, J., & West, M. A. (2018) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12285 · Cited by 39
van der Schalk, J., Beersma, B., Kleef, G. A. V., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.633 · Cited by 39
How the need for cognition scale predicts behavior in mock jury deliberations.
Shestowsky, D., & Horowitz, L. M. (2004) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/b:lahu.0000029141.46850.fb · Cited by 39
Supporting initial trust in distributed idea generation and idea evaluation
Schumann, J., Shih, P. C., Redmiles, D., & Horton, G. (2012) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/2389176.2389207 · Cited by 40
Kivlighan, D. M., London, K., & Miles, J. R. (2012) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0026242 · Cited by 38
Professional Communication Skills for Health Studies
Chute, A., Johnston, S., & Pawliuk, B. (2023) · doi:10.31542/b.gm.3 · Cited by 39
One for all and all for one - towards a framework for collaboration support systems
Siemon, D., Becker, F., Eckardt, L., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2017) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9651-9 · Cited by 46
The proximal‐virtual team continuum: A study of performance
Workman, M. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20545 · Cited by 39
The Effect of Individual Difference Variables on Information Sharing in Decision-Making Groups
Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2004) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/30.4.540 · Cited by 38
Creative Collaborations From Afar: The Benefits of Independent Authors
Nemeth, C. J., & Goncalo, J. A. (2005) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_1 · Cited by 38
A Systematic Review of Developing Team Competencies in Information Systems Education
Figl, K. (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 38
Horowitz, M. C., Stewart, B., Tingley, D. H., Bishop, M., Samotin, L. R., Roberts, M. E., Chang, W., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/704437 · Cited by 40
Ferrari, J. R., & Pychyl, T. A. (2012) · North American journal of psychology · Cited by 37
Giordano, A. P., Patient, D., Passos, A., & Sguera, F. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2418 · Cited by 43
Knockaert, M., & Vanacker, T. (2011) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9378-8
High performance and meeting participation: An observational study in software design teams.
Sonnentag, S. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.1.3 · Cited by 39
Coworker ability and effort as determinants of individual effort on a collective task.
Hart, J. W., Bridgett, D. J., & Karau, S. J. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.3.181 · Cited by 37
Self-citationPromoting teacher's professional development
Runhaar, P. R. (2008) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036527514 · Cited by 39
Are Morally Good Actions Ever Free?
Clark, C. J., Shniderman, A. B., Luguri, J. B., Baumeister, R. F., & Ditto, P. H. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.006 · Cited by 37
Walter, N. T., Markett, S. A., Montag, C., & Reuter, M. (2010) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2010.527169 · Cited by 38
Høigaard, R., Fuglestad, S., Peters, D. M., Cuyper, B. D., Backer, M. D., & Boen, F. (2010) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2010.495326 · Cited by 36
Nonresponse Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching
Bacon, D. R., Johnson, C. J., & Stewart, K. A. (2016) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2016.1166442 · Cited by 36
Dierdorff, E. C., Fisher, D. M., & Rubin, R. S. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318774622 · Cited by 40
Effect of inequality on cooperation: Heterogeneity and hegemony in public goods dilemma
Fung, J. M. Y., & Au, W. T. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.010 · Cited by 36
Quality, Conformity, and Conflict: Questioning the Assumptions of Osborn’s Brainstorming Technique
Goldenberg, O., & Wiley, J. (2011) · The Journal of Problem Solving · doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1093 · Cited by 36
Grouped Out? Undergraduates' Default Strategies For Participating in Multiple Small Groups
Gillespie, D. F., Rosamond, S., & Thomas, E. A. (2006) · The Journal of General Education · doi:10.1353/jge.2006.0022 · Cited by 37
How Leaders’ Diversity Beliefs Alter the Impact of Faultlines on Team Functioning
Schölmerich, F., Schermuly, C. C., & Deller, J. (2016) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496416630960 · Cited by 36
Exploring service climate and employee performance in multicultural service settings
Fung, C., Sharma, P., Wu, Z., & Su, Y. J. (2017) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-08-2016-0316 · Cited by 38
Sun, H., Zhang, L.-Y., & Meng, J. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-06-2019-0301 · Cited by 32
Invention Development. The Hackathon Method
Ryś, M. (2021) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2021.1911607 · Cited by 37
Learning Together While Designing: Does Group Size Make a Difference?
Apedoe, X. S., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2011) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9284-5 · Cited by 35
Teams, Team Motivation, and the Theory of the Firm
Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2012) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.2559 · Cited by 36
Huguet, P., Charbonnier, E., & Monteil, J. (1999) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.3.2.118 · Cited by 37
A team fares well with a fair coach: Predictors of social loafing in interactive female sport teams
Backer, M. D., Boen, F., Cuyper, B. D., Høigaard, R., & Broek, G. V. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.12303 · Cited by 35
Perceived identifiability, shared responsibility and innovative work behavior
Shih, H., & Susanto, E. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1143860 · Cited by 37
Ye, Y., Chen, M., Wu, L., & Kwan, H. K. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103420 · Cited by 36
Visualization of Group Members' Participation
Kimmerle, J., & Creß, U. (2009) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439309332312 · Cited by 38
Examining the Influence of Other-Efficacy and Self-Efficacy on Personal Performance
Dunlop, W. L., Beatty, D. J., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.33.4.586 · Cited by 33
Cirella, S., Radaelli, G., & Shani, A. B. R. (2014) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-12-2012-0261 · Cited by 36
Dynamic tabletop interfaces for increasing creativity
Schmitt, L. J., Stéphanie Buisine, A., Chaboissier, J., Aoussat, A., & Vernier, F. D. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.007 · Cited by 33
Lee, H.-W. (2017) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x17721300 · Cited by 39
A novel metaheuristic approach for collaborative learning group formation
Lambić, D., Lazović, B., Djenić, A., & Marić, M. M. (2018) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12299 · Cited by 35
The Role of Individual Differences in Group and Team Creativity
Coursey, L. E., Paulus, P. B., Williams, B. C., & Kenworthy, J. B. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813238-8.00014-0 · Cited by 33
Hybrid intelligence in hospitals: towards a research agenda for collaboration
Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., & Frick, N. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00457-4 · Cited by 37
Student Perceptions of Social Loafing in Undergraduate Business Classroom Teams
Jassawalla, A. R., Malshe, A., & Sashittal, H. C. (2008) · Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00183.x · Cited by 33
Challenging group dynamics in participatory design with children
Mechelen, M. V., Zaman, B., Laenen, A., & Abeele, V. V. (2015) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/2771839.2771862 · Cited by 37
Goal Instructions, Response Format, and Idea Generation in Groups
Goldenberg, O., Larson, J. R., & Wiley, J. (2013) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496413486701 · Cited by 33
Das, S., Laput, G., Harrison, C., & Hong, J. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025991 · Cited by 33
Motivation Resulting from Completed and Missing Actions
Fishbach, A., Koo, M., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2014) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800284-1.00005-9 · Cited by 33
On the Elusive Search for Motivation Gains in Groups: Insights from the Collective Effort Model
Karau, S. J., Markus, M. J., & Williams, K. D. (2000) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.179 · Cited by 33
Self-citationMolleman, E., Nauta, A., & Buunk, B. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00207.x · Cited by 33
Let the computer evaluate your idea: evaluation apprehension in human-computer collaboration
Siemon, D. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.2023638 · Cited by 38
Happy Talk: Is Common Diversity Rhetoric Effective Diversity Rhetoric?
Leslie, L. M., Flynn, E., Foster-Gimbel, O. A., & Manchester, C. F. (2023) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2021.1402 · Cited by 37
Investigating collaborative problem solving skills and outcomes across computer-based tasks
Andrews‐Todd, J., Jiang, Y., Steinberg, J., Pugh, S. L., & D’Mello, S. K. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104928 · Cited by 36
Cooperation goals, regulatory focus, and their combined effects on creativity
Bittner, J. V., Bruena, M., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.12.002 · Cited by 32
Human Supervisory Control Challenges in Network-Centric Operations
Cummings, M. L., Bruni, S., & Mitchell, P. J. (2010) · Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics · doi:10.1518/155723410x12849346788660 · Cited by 32
A multilevel model of multiteam motivation and performance
Rico, R., Hinsz, V. B., Burke, S., & Salas, E. (2016) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386616665456 · Cited by 34
The allure of the bottle as a package: an assessment of perceived effort in a packaging context
Söderlund, M., Colliander, J., Karsberg, J., Liljedal, K. T., Modig, E., Rosengren, S., Sagfossen, S., Szugalski, S., & Åkestam, N. (2017) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-12-2015-1065 · Cited by 33
Online collaboration in a large university class supports quality teaching
Yang, N., Ghislandi, P., & Dellantonio, S. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9564-8 · Cited by 34
Visualized Automatic Feedback in Virtual Teams
Glikson, E., Woolley, A. W., Gupta, P., & Kim, Y. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00814 · Cited by 34
Maran, T. K., Furtner, M. R., Liegl, S., Ravet‐Brown, T., Haraped, L., & Sachse, P. (2020) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12291 · Cited by 34
Stretching the success in reward-based crowdfunding
Yaşar, B., Yılmaz, I. S., Hatipoğlu, N., & Altay‐Salih, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.053 · Cited by 32
Wong, A. S. H., Tjosvold, D., & Liu, C. (2009) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00554.x · Cited by 34
Burke, M., & Settles, B. (2011) · International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T) · doi:10.1145/2103354.2103356 · Cited by 32
Teng, C.-C. C., & Luo, Y.-P. (2014) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-014-0177-2 · Cited by 35
Evaluation Concerns and the Köhler Effect
Lount, R. B., Park, E. S., Kerr, N. L., Messé, L. A., & Seok, D. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496408323215 · Cited by 32
Bedwell, B., Leygue, C., Goulden, M., McAuley, D., Colley, J., Ferguson, E., Banks, N., & Spence, A. (2014) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2014.978276 · Cited by 31
So, T. T. C., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. (2010) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320903384821 · Cited by 31
Grossman, R., & Burke‐Smalley, L. A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.08.001 · Cited by 40
Gyory, J. T., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2018) · Research in Engineering Design · doi:10.1007/s00163-018-00303-3 · Cited by 31
Wergin, V. V., Mallett, C. J., Mesagno, C., Zimanyi, Z., & Beckmann, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01331 · Cited by 31
Yam, K. C., Tang, P. M., & Lam, C. (2022) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12517 · Cited by 33
Yıldız, B., Kaptan, Z., Yıldız, T., Elibol, E., Yıldız, H., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120209 · Cited by 42
Research and intervention in sport psychology: New perspectives on an inherent conflict
Kellmann, M., & Beckmann, J. (2003) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2003.9671701 · Cited by 31
Self-Presentation and Group Influence
Carron, A. V., Burke, S. M., & Harry Prapavessis, A. (2004) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200490260044 · Cited by 31
Dragging Down and Dragging Up: How Relative Group Status Affects Responses to Common Fate.
Hornsey, M. J., van Leeuwen, E., & Santen, W. V. (2003) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.4.275 · Cited by 31
The Effects of Team Size in a Marketing Simulation
Cossé, T. J., Ashworth, D. N., & Weisenberger, T. M. (1999) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.1999.11501844 · Cited by 31
The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
Kirschner, P. A., Kirschner, F., & Janssen, J. J. H. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.027 · Cited by 33
Indispensability and group identification as sources of task motivation
Gockel, C., Kerr, N. L., Seok, D., & Harris, D. W. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.011 · Cited by 31
Meta-analysis and the study of group dynamics.
Mullen, B. D., Driskell, J. E., & Eduardo Salas, A. (1998) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.2.4.213 · Cited by 31
We Hold Ourselves Accountable: A Relational View of Team Accountability
Kay, V. S., Snyder, D. G., & Kou, C.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04969-z · Cited by 50
Caton, H., & Greenhill, D. R. (2014) · International Journal of Game-Based Learning · doi:10.4018/ijgbl.2014070101 · Cited by 30
Low-quality LMX relationships, leader incivility, and follower responses
Thompson, G., Buch, R., & Glasø, L. (2018) · Journal of General Management · doi:10.1177/0306307018788808 · Cited by 30
Effects of roles assignment and learning styles on pair learning in robotics education
Zhong, B., & Wang, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09536-2 · Cited by 34
Increasing conspicuity on night-time roads: Perspectives from cyclists and runners
Fylan, F., King, M., Brough, D., Black, A. A., King, N. A., Bentley, L., & Wood, J. M. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.016 · Cited by 30
Coworker Trust and Knowledge Sharing among Public Sector Employees in Kenya
Kipkosgei, F., Son, S. Y., & Kang, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17062009 · Cited by 36
Downes, P. E., Gonzalez-Mule, E. N., Seong, J. Y., & Park, W. (2021) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12360 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 681-706
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2006674865
- Cited by
- 2,196
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 103
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- social loafing, collective effort, task meaningfulness, cultural differences, expectancy-value theory, social identity, self-validation, team motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review