The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Abstract
Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. A meta-analysis of 78 studies demonstrates that social loafing is robust and generalizes across tasks and S populations. A large number of variables were found to moderate social loafing. Evaluation potential, expectations of co-worker performance, task meaningfulness, and culture had especially strong influence. These findings are interpreted in the light of a Collective Effort Model that integrates elements of expectancy-value, social identity, and self-validation theories. Many of life's most important tasks can only be accomplished in groups, and many group tasks are collective tasks that require the pooling of individual members' inputs. Government task forces, sports teams, organizational committees, symphony orchestras, juries, and quality control teams provide but a few examples of groups that combine individual efforts to form a single product. Because collective work settings are so pervasive and indispensable, it is important to determine which factors motivate and demotivate individuals within these collective contexts. Intuition might lead to the conclusion that working with others should inspire individuals to maximize their potential and work especially hard. Research on social loafing, however, has revealed that individuals frequently exert less effort on collective tasks than on individual tasks. Formally, social loafing is the reduction in motivation and effort when individuals work collectively compared with when they work individually or coactively. When working collectively, individuals work in the real or imagined presence of others with whom they combine their inputs to form a single group product. When working coactively, individuals work in the real or imagined presence of others, but their inputs are not combined with the inputs of others. Determining the conditions under which individuals do or do not engage in social loafing is a problem of both theoretical and practical importance. At a practical level, the identification of moderating variables may
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Group work also increases the probability of social loafing, the tendency for individuals to demonstrate less effort when working collectively than when working individually (Karau and Williams, 1993).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Karau and Williams, 1993
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,583
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
(1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,439
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Möllmann, N. R. J., & Rzyski, J. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10201-0 · Cited by 35
Corrégé, J.-B., & Michinov, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.733663 · Cited by 31
On the Perception of Newcomers
Cimino, A., & Delton, A. W. (2010) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9088-y · Cited by 30
Engaging Families in Lifestyle Changes Through Social Networking
Baghaei, N., Kimani, S., Freyne, J., Brindal, E., Berkovsky, S., & Smith, G. (2011) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.555315 · Cited by 30
Shared Cognition and Participation in Small Groups
Bonito, J. A. (2004) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650204269406 · Cited by 30
The Effects of Incentive System and Cognitive Orientation on Teams' Performance
Naranjo‐Gil, D., Cuevas‐Rodríguez, G., Cabrales, Á. L., & Sánchez, J. M. (2012) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-50098 · Cited by 33
Arterberry, M., Cain, K., & Chopko, S. A. (2007) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410701308755 · Cited by 38
Role of social loafing in predeliberation decision making.
Henningsen, D. D., Cruz, M. G., & Miller, M. L. (2000) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.4.2.168 · Cited by 30
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DICTATORSHIP
Jung, C. G. (1978) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691216393-018 · Cited by 29
Wang, D., Wang, H., Yu, M., Ashktorab, Z., & Tan, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512941 · Cited by 39
Subjective theories of organizing and learning from events
Schöbel, M., & Manzey, D. (2010) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2010.03.004 · Cited by 32
Factors Affecting Team Size and Task Performance in Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation
Kelleher, D. C., Kovler, M. L., Waterhouse, L. J., Carter, E. A., & Burd, R. S. (2014) · Pediatric Emergency Care · doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000000106 · Cited by 29
Social support from fellow group members triggers additional effort in groups
Hüffmeier, J., Wessolowski, K., van Randenborgh, A., Bothin, J., Schmid‐Loertzer, N., & Hertel, G. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2021 · Cited by 29
Crook, A. E., & Beier, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0021913 · Cited by 29
Effects of Anonymity and Social Comparison of Rewards on Computer-Mediated Group Brainstorming
McLeod, P. L. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410397381 · Cited by 31
The Effect of Team Cohesion on Social Loafing in Relay Teams
Høigaard, R., Tofteland, I., & Ommundsen, Y. (2006) · International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences · Cited by 29
Interpersonal influences on goals: Current and future directions for goal contagion research
Laurin, K. (2016) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12289 · Cited by 29
How winning changes motivation in multiphase competitions.
Huang, S., Etkin, J., & Jin, L. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000082 · Cited by 29
Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system
Donia, M. B. L., Mach, M., O’Neill, T. A., & Brutus, S. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1912286 · Cited by 27
Challenges for collaborative blended learning in undergraduate students
Monteiro, E., & Morrison, K. (2014) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2014.997126 · Cited by 45
Divergent and Convergent Collaborative Creativity
Paulus, P. B., Coursey, L. E., & Kenworthy, J. B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_16 · Cited by 28
Kaltenbrunner, K. A., & Renzl, B. E. (2019) · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-019-00123-6 · Cited by 28
Social Loafing in Organizational Work Groups: The Mitigating Effect of Servant Leadership
Stouten, J., & Liden, R. C. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-849867-5.00002-1 · Cited by 36
Social Dilemma in Knowledge Communication via Shared Databases
Creß, U., Barquero, B., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-24319-4_7 · Cited by 28
Segev, R., Shoham, A., & Ruvio, A. A. (2012) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20561 · Cited by 28
Rossberger, R. J., & Krause, D. E. (2014) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/1069397114534825 · Cited by 28
Protestant work ethic moderates social loafing.
Smrt, D., & Karau, S. J. (2011) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0024484 · Cited by 29
Self-citationPersonalityzation: UI Personalization, Theoretical Grounding in HCI and Design Research
Arazy, O., Nov, O., & Kumar, N. (2015) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00065 · Cited by 28
Creativity, Talent and Excellence
Tan, A.-G., & Springer Malaysia Representative Office (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-4021-93-7 · Cited by 31
del Barco, B. L., Mendo-Lázaro, S., Castaño, E. F., Bullón, F. F., & Gallego, D. I. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00326 · Cited by 28
Modeling social support on social media: Effect of publicness and the underlying mechanisms
Liu, B., & Wei, L. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.006 · Cited by 28
An exploration of world of Warcraft for the gamification of virtual organizations
Rapp, A. (2020) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100985 · Cited by 31
Regulating Behavior in Online Communities
(2012) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8472.003.0005 · Cited by 29
Trying Harder for Different Reasons
Lount, R. B., Messé, L. A., & Kerr, N. L. (2000) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.221 · Cited by 28
The Role of Knowledge Sharing in Raising the Task Innovativeness of Systems Analysts
Weisberg, J., Reychav, I., Stein, E. W., & Glezer, C. (2012) · International Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.4018/jkm.2012040101 · Cited by 32
Social loafing in group-based learning: student-created and instructor-created group perspectives
Rajaguru, R., Narendran, R., & Rajesh, G. (2020) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-01-2019-0018 · Cited by 27
Diffusion of responsibility in group work: Social loafing
Tosuntaş, Ş. B. (2020) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.2020465073 · Cited by 29
Briker, R., Hohmann, S., Walter, F. H., Lam, C. K., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2539 · Cited by 30
Xiang, Y., Vélez, N., & Gershman, S. J. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001336 · Cited by 31
Ingstad, E. S. L., Knockaert, M., & Fassin, Y. (2014) · Venture Capital · doi:10.1080/13691066.2014.988379 · Cited by 27
Gendered Ways to Motivation Gains in Groups
Weber, B., Wittchen, M., & Hertel, G. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9574-4 · Cited by 27
“… with a little help from my friends”: friendship, effort norms, and group motivation gain
Kerr, N. L., & Seok, D. (2011) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941111112640 · Cited by 27
Overcoming Collaborative Inhibition through Error Correction: A Classroom Experiment
Gadgil, S., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1843 · Cited by 23
Twenty‐First Century Employment Relationships: The Case for an Altruistic Model
Clarkson, G. P. (2014) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21567 · Cited by 28
Conroy, S. A., & Gupta, N. (2015) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601115607746 · Cited by 29
Impact of Behavioral Factors on Performance of Multi‐Server Queueing Systems
Hung, T., Shunko, M., Lucas, M. T., & Novak, D. C. (2018) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12883 · Cited by 27
Mankad, A., Loechel, B., & Measham, P. F. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0477-z · Cited by 27
Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming
Gobbo, F., Piero, B., Jacopo, G., & Massimiliano, P. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73101-6 · Cited by 27
Andrade, E. B., & Vieites, Y. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.70003 · Cited by 33
Chen, F., Zhang, L., & Latimer, J. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.001 · Cited by 26
Voyles, E. C., Bailey, S. F., & Durik, A. M. (2015) · The New School psychology bulletin · Cited by 26
Behavior‒Output Control Theory, Trust and Social Loafing in Virtual Teams
Robert, L. (2020) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti4030039 · Cited by 32
Sustaining Collaborative Effort in Work Teams: Exchange Ideology and Employee Social Loafing
Byun, G., Lee, S., Karau, S. J., & Dai, Y. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12156241 · Cited by 27
Self-citationTo Pool or Not to Pool? The Effect of Loss Aversion on Queue Configurations
Zhou, W., Wang, D., Huang, W., & Guo, P. (2021) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13521 · Cited by 26
Do jigsaw classrooms improve learning outcomes? Five experiments and an internal meta-analysis.
Stanczak, A., Darnon, C., Robert, A., Demolliens, M., Sanrey, C., Bressoux, P., Huguet, P., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2022) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000730 · Cited by 49
Collaboration and communication in blended learning environments
Johler, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.980445 · Cited by 26
Is bigger better? A study of the effect of group size on collective intelligence in online groups
Hashmi, N., Shankaranarayanan, G., & Malone, T. W. (2022) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2022.113914 · Cited by 26
Budde-Sung, A. (2011) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.03.003 · Cited by 26
Liu, G., Xiang, G., Pendleton, B. A., Hong, J., & Liu, W. (2011) · Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2078827.2078838 · Cited by 26
Hénaff, B. L., Michinov, N., Bohec, O. L., & Delaval, M. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.002 · Cited by 26
MacDonald, E., Milfont, T. L., & Gavin, M. (2016) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2015.1091464 · Cited by 27
An Expectancy Theory Approach to Group Coordination: Expertise, Task Features, and Member Behavior
Baumann, M. R., & Bonner, B. L. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1954 · Cited by 26
Effects of relative team size on teams with innovative tasks
Weiß, M., & Hoegl, M. (2015) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386615620837 · Cited by 32
Online Peer Groups as a Persuasive Tool to Combat Digital Addiction
Alrobai, A., McAlaney, J., Phalp, K. T., & Ali, R. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_25 · Cited by 28
All together now? College students' preferred project group grading procedures.
Hoffman, J. R., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.1.33 · Cited by 26
Pitfalls of information access with visualizations in remote collaborative analysis
Balakrishnan, A., Fussell, S. R., Kiesler, S. B., & Kittur, A. (2010) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1718918.1718988 · Cited by 26
Whiteoak, J. W. (2007) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-007-9047-8 · Cited by 27
Knowledge contribution in problem solving virtual communities
Yu, J., Jiang, Z. J., & Chan, H. C. (2007) · ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR) · doi:10.1145/1235000.1235034 · Cited by 24
The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
Abel, M., & Roediger, H. L., III (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000148 · Cited by 26
Fransen, K., Vansteenkiste, M., Broek, G. V., & Boen, F. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200480 · Cited by 31
Hyeong, J. H., Choi, K. J., Lee, J. Y., & Pyo, T.-H. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113423 · Cited by 28
Cole, C., Marhefka, J., Jablokow, K., Mohammed, S., Ritter, S. C., & Miller, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4054874 · Cited by 27
Report of a Measure of Academic Entitlement
Jackson, D. L., Singleton-Jackson, J. A., & Frey, M. P. (2011) · Cited by 25
Roncaglia, I. (2016) · Psychological Thought · doi:10.5964/psyct.v9i1.145 · Cited by 25
Multimodal, Multiparty Modeling of Collaborative Problem Solving Performance
Subburaj, S. K., Stewart, A., Rao, A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2020) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/3382507.3418877 · Cited by 27
Putting Communication into the Study of Group Memory
Wittenbaum, G. M. (2003) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00860.x · Cited by 25
The Role of Internal and External Sources of Evaluation in Motivating Task Performance
Harkins, S. G., White, P. H., & Utman, C. H. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167200261010 · Cited by 25
Should there be a romance between teams and groups?
Paulus, P. B., & van der Zee, K. I. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/0963179042596496 · Cited by 25
Search behavior of individuals working in teams: A behavioral study on complex landscapes
Giannoccaro, I., Galešić, M., Massari, G. F., Barkoczi, D., & Carbone, G. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.045 · Cited by 24
Motivation und Volition im Handlungsverlauf
Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2018) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53927-9_12 · Cited by 24
Creativity and negotiation research: the integrative potential
Wilson, E. R., & Thompson, L. (2014) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-05-2014-0033 · Cited by 27
Social Compensation: Fact or Social-Comparison Artifact?
Todd, A. R., Seok, D., Kerr, N. L., & Messé, L. A. (2006) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430206064643 · Cited by 24
Ivanov, A., & Cyr, D. (2014) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2013.12.004 · Cited by 24
Bullying as a Means to Foster Compliance
Juvonen, J., & Galván, A. (2009) · Cited by 24
Stewart, A., Keirn, Z. A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/3242969.3242989 · Cited by 24
From Resources to Value and Back: Competition Between and Within Organizations
Mol, J. M., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2010) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00711.x · Cited by 24
Rowe, F. (2005) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000042 · Cited by 24
Antecedents of team reward attitude.
Haines, V. Y., & Taggar, S. (2006) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.194 · Cited by 24
The Intervening Task Method: Implications for Measuring Mediation
Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211399776 · Cited by 26
Developing a serious game to evaluate and train group decision making skills
Linehan, C., Lawson, S. W., Doughty, M., & Kirman, B. J. (2009) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/1621841.1621861 · Cited by 28
Group Effects on Individual Attitudes Toward Social Responsibility
Secchi, D., & Bui, H. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3106-x · Cited by 30
Guérin, B. (1999) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395327 · Cited by 23
Klehe, U., & Anderson, N. (2007) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00385.x · Cited by 39
Wood, S., Leoni, S., & Ladley, D. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100982 · Cited by 33
Zhang, A. X., Ackerman, M. S., & Karger, D. R. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702194 · Cited by 23
Nokes‐Malach, T. J., Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235631.021 · Cited by 25
Anticipated temporal landmarks undermine motivation for continued goal pursuit
Koo, M., Dai, H., Mai, K. M., & Song, C. E. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.06.002 · Cited by 22
Cleaning up our acts: Psychological interventions to reduce engine idling and improve air quality
Abrams, D., Lalot, F., Hopthrow, T., Templeton, A., Steeden, B., Özkeçeci, H., Imada, H., Warbis, S., Sandiford, D., Meleady, R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101587 · Cited by 23
A Framework for Assessment of Student Project Groups On-Line and Off-Line
Gweon, G., Jun, S., Lee, J., Finger, S., & Rosé, C. P. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_14 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 681-706
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2006674865
- Cited by
- 2,196
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 103
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- social loafing, collective effort, task meaningfulness, cultural differences, expectancy-value theory, social identity, self-validation, team motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review