The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Abstract
Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. A meta-analysis of 78 studies demonstrates that social loafing is robust and generalizes across tasks and S populations. A large number of variables were found to moderate social loafing. Evaluation potential, expectations of co-worker performance, task meaningfulness, and culture had especially strong influence. These findings are interpreted in the light of a Collective Effort Model that integrates elements of expectancy-value, social identity, and self-validation theories. Many of life's most important tasks can only be accomplished in groups, and many group tasks are collective tasks that require the pooling of individual members' inputs. Government task forces, sports teams, organizational committees, symphony orchestras, juries, and quality control teams provide but a few examples of groups that combine individual efforts to form a single product. Because collective work settings are so pervasive and indispensable, it is important to determine which factors motivate and demotivate individuals within these collective contexts. Intuition might lead to the conclusion that working with others should inspire individuals to maximize their potential and work especially hard. Research on social loafing, however, has revealed that individuals frequently exert less effort on collective tasks than on individual tasks. Formally, social loafing is the reduction in motivation and effort when individuals work collectively compared with when they work individually or coactively. When working collectively, individuals work in the real or imagined presence of others with whom they combine their inputs to form a single group product. When working coactively, individuals work in the real or imagined presence of others, but their inputs are not combined with the inputs of others. Determining the conditions under which individuals do or do not engage in social loafing is a problem of both theoretical and practical importance. At a practical level, the identification of moderating variables may
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Group work also increases the probability of social loafing, the tendency for individuals to demonstrate less effort when working collectively than when working individually (Karau and Williams, 1993).”
From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Karau and Williams, 1993
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,583
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
(1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,439
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices
Leana, C. R., & van Buren, H. J. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2202136 · Cited by 2,063
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236
An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09339057 · Cited by 2,721
Models of the self: self-construals and gender.
Cross, S., & Madson, L. (1997) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5 · Cited by 2,851
Williams, K. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641 · Cited by 1,828
Self-citationOne Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 · Cited by 1,558
Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration
Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720810376055 · Cited by 1,710
Work Groups and Teams in Organizations
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1214 · Cited by 1,551
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428
Group Performance and Decision Making
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009 · Cited by 1,332
Peterson, R. A. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/323732 · Cited by 1,258
Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.13670967 · Cited by 1,170
Developing design propositions through research synthesis
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & van Aken, J. E. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607088020 · Cited by 1,057
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,011
Williams, K. D. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00406-1 · Cited by 1,428
Self-citationGrant, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108 · Cited by 1,114
Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations
Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H.-C. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2888 · Cited by 834
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013935 · Cited by 836
Personal Selling and Sales Management: A Relationship Marketing Perspective
Weitz, B. A., & Bradford, K. (1999) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070399272008 · Cited by 800
New Developments in Social Interdependence Theory
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005) · Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs · doi:10.3200/mono.131.4.285-358 · Cited by 861
Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis
Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Klein, C. R., Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Goodwin, G. F., & Halpin, S. M. (2008) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x375009 · Cited by 859
Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities
Ren, Y., Kraut, R. E., & Kiesler, S. B. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607076007 · Cited by 748
Does automation bias decision-making?
SKITKA, L. J., MOSIER, K. L., & BURDICK, M. (1999) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0252 · Cited by 694
Social Ostracism by Coworkers: Does Rejection Lead to Loafing or Compensation?
Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297237003 · Cited by 669
Self-citationThe Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation
Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00005 · Cited by 677
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022465 · Cited by 563
The Social Identity Perspective
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404263424 · Cited by 564
Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers in KickstarterPreprint
Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2234765 · Cited by 554
The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory.
Wallace, H. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.819 · Cited by 678
Research in the Psychological Laboratory
Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00002 · Cited by 500
Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities
Ling, K. S., Beenen, G., Ludford, P. J., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., Rashid, A. M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00273.x · Cited by 526
Work Groups and Teams in Organizations
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop212017 · Cited by 512
Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on MovieLens
Chen, Y., Harper, F. M., Konstan, J. A., & Li, S. X. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1358 · Cited by 487
Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1160 · Cited by 498
Decuyper, S., Dochy, F. J. R. C., & den Bossche, P. V. (2010) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002 · Cited by 552
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039654 · Cited by 448
Williams, K. D. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9354-3_7 · Cited by 447
Self-citationSelf-Leadership: A Multilevel Review
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310383911 · Cited by 541
Social Loafing: A Field Investigation
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2003) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002 · Cited by 456
How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groups
Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27005-9 · Cited by 395
Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320344000228 · Cited by 390
Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving
Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618808244 · Cited by 390
Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470029307.ch2 · Cited by 395
Whitman, D. S., ROOY, D. L. V., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01162.x · Cited by 382
HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks
(2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-808-5.x5000-x · Cited by 377
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000113 · Cited by 375
Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x · Cited by 364
The “Why’s” of Class Size: Student Behavior in Small Classes
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (2003) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543073003321 · Cited by 352
Shared Leadership and Innovation: The Role of Vertical Leadership and Employee Integrity
Hoch, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9273-6 · Cited by 408
Bayazıt, M., & Mannix, E. A. (2003) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496403034003002 · Cited by 341
Arguello, J., Butler, B. S., Joyce, E., Kraut, R. E., Ling, K. S., Rosé, C. P., & Wang, X. (2006) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124916 · Cited by 347
Jung, J. H., Schneider, C., & Valacich, J. S. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1129 · Cited by 357
Borrego, M. J., Karlin, J., McNair, L., & Beddoes, K. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20023 · Cited by 361
Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups
Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0051 · Cited by 323
Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities
Beenen, G., Ling, K. S., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski, D., Resnick, P., & Kraut, R. E. (2004) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1031607.1031642 · Cited by 328
Motivations to participate in online communities
Lampe, C. A. C., Wash, R., Velásquez, A., & Ozkaya, E. (2010) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753616 · Cited by 320
Entrepreneurs as theorists: on the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies
Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2009) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.67 · Cited by 325
Terveen, L., & McDonald, D. W. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1096737.1096740 · Cited by 315
Khan, H., Rehmat, M., Butt, T. H., Farooqi, S., & Asim, J. (2020) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-020-00043-8 · Cited by 314
Brooks, C. M., & Ammons, J. L. (2003) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832320309598613 · Cited by 342
A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015) · Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2 · Cited by 507
Environmental factors and work performance of project managers in the construction industry
Pheng, L. S., & Chuan, Q. T. (2005) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.001 · Cited by 307
HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary
Rogers, Y. (2012) · HCI Theory · doi:10.2200/s00418ed1v01y201205hci014 · Cited by 387
Reflexivity for Team Innovation in China
Tjosvold, D., Tang, M., & West, M. A. (2004) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601103254911 · Cited by 314
Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance.
Driskell, J. E., Radtke, P. H., & Salas, E. (2003) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.4.297 · Cited by 317
Effects of Process Feedback on Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance in Virtual Teams
Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406292337 · Cited by 316
Hu, J. J., & Liden, R. C. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.1142 · Cited by 308
Brainstorming, Brainstorming Rules and Decision Making
Putman, V. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2009) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01304.x · Cited by 284
Leading by example: The case of leader OCB.
Yaffe, T., & Kark, R. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022464 · Cited by 312
Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone?
Walker, C. J. (2010) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760903271116 · Cited by 318
Interactive minds: A facilitative setting for wisdom-related performance?
Staudinger, U. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.746 · Cited by 319
Wikipedians are born, not made
Panciera, K. A., Halfaker, A., & Terveen, L. (2009) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/1531674.1531682 · Cited by 276
DER, G. S. V., de Vliert, E. V., & Oosterhof, A. (2003) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/30040663 · Cited by 305
Evaluating Pair Programming with Respect to System Complexity and Programmer Expertise
Arisholm, E., Gallis, H., Dybå, T., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.17 · Cited by 277
Chapter 6 Ostracism: A Temporal Need‐Threat Model
Williams, K. D. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · Cited by 270
Self-citationManaging Joint Production Motivation: The Role of Goal Framing and Governance Mechanisms
Lindenberg, S. M., & Foss, N. J. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.61031808 · Cited by 276
Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity
Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R. B., & Hoppen, N. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.110 · Cited by 281
Sparks, J. R., & Schenk, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.116 · Cited by 269
Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L., & Maruping, L. M. (2010) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222270109 · Cited by 265
Organizational Silence and Hidden Threats to Patient Safety
Henriksen, K., & Dayton, E. (2006) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00564.x · Cited by 277
Kwon, K., Liu, Y.-H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004 · Cited by 265
Gallus, J. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2540 · Cited by 273
When Is It Better to Learn Together? Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning
Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8 · Cited by 308
The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom
Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A. F., & Terwel, J. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8 · Cited by 271
Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity.
Bechtoldt, M. N., Dreu, C. K. W. D., Nijstad, B. A., & Choi, H. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019386 · Cited by 246
The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries
Nemeth, C. J., Personnaz, B., Personnaz, M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2004) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.210 · Cited by 252
The Diseconomies of Queue Pooling: An Empirical Investigation of Emergency Department Length of Stay
Song, H., Tucker, A. L., & Murrell, K. L. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2118 · Cited by 234
Using Accountability to Reduce Access Policy Violations in Information Systems
Vance, A., Lowry, P. B., & Eggett, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290410 · Cited by 257
Understanding Social Loafing: The Role of Justice Perceptions and Exchange Relationships
Murphy, S. M., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Erdoğan, B. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726703056001450 · Cited by 229
DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2005) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.003 · Cited by 227
Personalized task recommendation in crowdsourcing information systems — Current state of the art
Geiger, D., & Schader, M. (2014) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.007 · Cited by 219
Shteynberg, G. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615589104 · Cited by 233
IS GROUP PRODUCTIVITY LOSS THE RULE OR THE EXCEPTION? EFFECTS OF CULTURE AND GROUP-BASED MOTIVATION.
Erez, M., & Somech, A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257067 · Cited by 211
Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects.
Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.544 · Cited by 211
Team-Based Professional Development Interventions in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & van der Veen, J. T. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317704306 · Cited by 211
Bonatti, A., & Hörner, J. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.632 · Cited by 207
The effectiveness of pair programming: A meta-analysis
Hannay, J. E., Dybå, T., Arisholm, E., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001 · Cited by 268
Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution
Rashid, A. M., Ling, K. S., Tassone, R. D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R. E., & Riedl, J. (2006) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124915 · Cited by 205
Performance, incentives, and needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: A meta-analysis
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Nassrelgrgawi, A. S. (2016) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9578-2 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 681-706
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2006674865
- Cited by
- 2,196
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 103
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- social loafing, collective effort, task meaningfulness, cultural differences, expectancy-value theory, social identity, self-validation, team motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review