Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation
Abstract
Five experiments used a relearning paradigm to determine whether people spontaneously make trait inferences from behavior descriptions. In each experiment, Ss learned actors'traits more readily after prior exposure to congruent descriptive stimuli (a «savings effect»), suggesting that implicit trait knowledge had been distilled from those descriptions. Moreover, this savings effect (a) was unaffected by Ss' processing objectives, (b) persisted for as long as a week after stimulus presentation, (c) occurred even when the original stimuli could not be recognized, and (d) could not be accounted for by priming mechanisms or differential familiarity with experimental materials. This evidence thus suggests that people do spontaneously derive trait knowledge from behavioral stimuli
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heuristics can operate seconds after meeting someone, influencing thoughts about desirability and relationship formation.
“Heuristics can operate only seconds after meeting someone, influencing our thoughts about how desirable they are as a person and whether we would want to work with them or form a lasting relationship (Carlston & Skowronski, 1994; Carney, Colvin, & Hall, 2007).”
From Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health (2010) · cites this paper as Carlston & Skowronski, 1994
Cites
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540 · see citing works
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699 · see citing works
Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 3,054 · see citing works
“Heuristics can operate only seconds after meeting someone, influencing our thoughts about how desirable they are as a person and whether we would want to work with them or form a lasting relationship (Carlston & Skowronski, 1994; Carney, Colvin, & Hall, 2007).”
BackgroundWilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.101 · Cited by 2,112 · see citing works
The representation of self and person knowledge in the medial prefrontal cortex
Wagner, D. D., Haxby, J. V., & Heatherton, T. F. (2012) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1183 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- ORCID
- Skowronski, John J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 840-856
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1997199485
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- trait inference, savings effect, relearning, behavioral description, person perception, priming, familiarity, recognition memory, implicit learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review