"If only I weren't" versus "If only I hadn't": Distinguishing shame and guilt in conterfactual thinking.

Abstract

The role of counterfactual thinking in 2 emotions--shame and guilt--was examined. In 1 series of studies, Ss read about situations evocative of shame and guilt or described personal experiences of guilt or shame. They then generated counterfactual alternatives to "undo" the distressing outcomes. Consistent with predictions derived from Tangney (1991), Ss tended to undo shame situations by altering qualities of the self and to undo guilt situations by altering actions. In a 2nd series of studies, Ss imagined themselves in a situation that could evoke either guilt or shame. Ss were then led to mutate the self or behavior to undo the situation. Mutation manipulations amplified shame and guilt such that the former Ss anticipated feeling greater shame, whereas the latter anticipated feeling greater guilt. The role of counterfactual thinking in specific emotions and in differentiating shame- and guilt-prone personalities is discussed.

Cites (1)

1. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
   Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making

Show all 1 references

Cited by (27)

1. Emotion, regulation, and moral development
   Eisenberg, Nancy · 2000 · Annual Review of Psychology
2. Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought
   Watkins, Edward R. · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Motivational and emotional aspects of the self
   Leary, Mark R. · 2007 · Annual Review of Psychology
4. Appraisal Antecedents of Shame and Guilt: Support for a Theoretical Model
   Tracy, Jessica L., Robins, Richard W. · 2006 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
5. Authentic and Hubristic Pride: The Affective Core of Self-esteem and Narcissism
   Tracy, Jessica L., Cheng, Joey T., Robins, Richard W., Trzesniewski, Kali H. · 2009 · Self and Identity

See all 458