"Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness.
Abstract
The consistency of physical attractiveness ratings across cultural groups was examined. In Study 1, recently arrived native Asian and Hispanic students and White Americans rated the attractiveness of Asian, Hispanic, Black, and White photographed women. The mean correlation between groups in attractiveness ratings was r =.93. Asians, Hispanics, and Whites were equally influenced by many facial features, but Asians were less influenced by some sexual maturity and expressive features. In Study 2, Taiwanese attractiveness ratings correlated with prior Asian, Hispanic, and American ratings, mean r =.91. Supporting Study 1, the Taiwanese also were less positively influenced by certain sexual maturity and expressive features. Exposure to Western media did not influence attractiveness ratings in either study. In Study 3, Black and White American men rated the attractiveness of Black female facial photos and body types. Mean facial attractiveness ratings were highly correlated (r = .94), but as predicted Blacks and Whites varied in judging bodies
Cites (8)
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
- Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V. · 1971 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 culturesBuss, David M. · 1989 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.Bornstein, Robert F. · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
- What is beautiful is good, but . . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype.Eagly, Alice H., Ashmore, Richard D., Makhijani, Mona G., Longo, Laura C. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
- Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferencesGangestad, Steven W., Buss, David M. · 1993 · Ethology and Sociobiology
- Attitude and Pupil SizeHess, Eckhard H. · 1965 · Scientific American
- Why littermates don't: The avoidance of inbreeding depressionBixler, Ray H. · 1992 · Annual Review of Sex Research
Cited by (19)
- Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical reviewLanglois, Judith H., Kalakanis, Lisa, Rubenstein, Adam J., Larson, Andrea, Hallam, Monica, Smoot, Monica · 2000 · Psychological Bulletin
- Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward ValueAharon, Itzhak, Etcoff, Nancy, Ariely, Dan, Chabris, Christopher F, O'Connor, Ethan, Breiter, Hans C · 2001 · Neuron
- Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance MattersZebrowitz, Leslie A., Montepare, Joann M. · 2008 · Social and Personality Psychology Compass
- Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated facesMacDorman, Karl F., Green, Robert D., Ho, Chin-Chang, Koch, Clinton T. · 2009 · Computers in Human Behavior
- Perspectives on Racial Phenotypicality BiasMaddox, Keith B. · 2004 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.261
- The paper
- Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., & Druen, P. B. (1995). "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.