Cited by 529Social and Intergroup PsychologyExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.

van den Bos, Kees, Lind, E. Allan, Vermunt, Riël, Wilke, Henk A. M.·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 529

Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Impact of Mortality Salience and Self-Esteem on Ratings of Negative Affect
van den Bos, K. (2001) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1012501506803 · Cited by 71
The construction of feelings of justice in environmental management: An empirical study of multiple biodiversity conflicts in Calakmul, Mexico
Lécuyer, L., White, R. M., Schmook, B. I., Lemay, V., & Calmé, S. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.050 · Cited by 71
The Effect of Compensation Size on Recovery Satisfaction After Group Service Failures: The Role of Group Versus Individual Service Recovery
Albrecht, A. K., Schaefers, T., Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670518802059 · Cited by 71
Grade expectations: the effects of expectations on fairness and satisfaction perceptions
Cherry, B., Ordóñez, L. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.452 · Cited by 70
Action control, proxy control, and consumers' evaluations of the service exchange
Namasivayam, K. (2004) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20014 · Cited by 70
Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process
van den Bos, K., Ham, J. R. C., Lind, E. A., Simonis, M., van Essen, W. J., & Rijpkema, M. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.001 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice
Roch, S. G., Sternburgh, A. M., & Caputo, P. M. (2007) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x · Cited by 68
Towards a diversity justice management model: integrating organizational justice and diversity management
Fujimoto, Y., Härtel, C. E. J., & Azmat, F. (2013) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/17471111311307877 · Cited by 68
Toward Understanding the Psychology of Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Role of Affect Intensity
van den Bos, K., Maas, M., Waldring, I., & Semin, G. R. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1024252104717 · Cited by 68
Representation of Categories
Boot, I., & Pecher, D. (2010) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000082 · Cited by 67
Recovery strategy for group service failures
Zhou, Y., Huang, M., Tsang, A. S. L., & Zhou, N. (2013) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090561311324255 · Cited by 67
Lucky Loyalty: The Effect of Consumer Effort on Predictions of Randomly Determined Marketing Outcomes
Reczek, R. W., Haws, K. L., & Summers, C. A. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/678052 · Cited by 67
Exploring the “Lost and Found” of Justice Theory and Research
Skitka, L. J. (2009) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-009-0089-0 · Cited by 67
Morality and justice: An expanded theoretical perspective and empirical review
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Mullen, E. (2008) · Advances in group processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(08)25001-0 · Cited by 67
Noise within the social context: Annoyance reduction through fair procedures
Maris, E., Stallen, P. J. M., Vermunt, R. C., & Steensma, H. (2007) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2535507 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
The influence of individual- and class-level fairness-related perceptions on student satisfaction
Wendorf, C. A., & Alexander, S. (2004) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.003 · Cited by 65
“Want to” Versus “Have to”: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivators as Predictors of Compliance Behavior Intention
Hofeditz, M., Nienaber, A., Dysvik, A., & Schewe, G. (2015) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21774 · Cited by 64
Psychology of Justice
Gollwitzer, M., & van Prooijen, J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_4 · Cited by 64
Justice and self-interest: two fundamental motives
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5138 · Cited by 64
On the Role of Perceived Procedural Justice in Citizens' Reactions to Government Decisions and the Handling of Conflicts
van den Bos, K., van der Velden, L., & Lind, E. A. (2014) · Utrecht Law Review · doi:10.18352/ulr.287 · Cited by 63
Self-citation
Artificial fairness? Trust in algorithmic police decision-making
Hobson, Z., Yesberg, J. A., Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-021-09484-9 · Cited by 62
Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations.
Vermunt, R. C., van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Blaauw, E. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.621 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Culture's Impact on the Importance of Fairness in Interorganizational Relationships
Lund, D. J., Scheer, L. K., & Kozlenkova, I. V. (2013) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.13.0020 · Cited by 61
Individual Conceptions of Justice and Their Potential for Explaining Proenvironmental Decision Making
Kals, E., & Russell, Y. (2001) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1014698528132 · Cited by 61
Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions.
Bartol, K. M., Durham, C. C., & Poon, J. M. L. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1106 · Cited by 60
Farmer share and fair distribution in food chains from a consumer’s perspective
Busch, G., & Spiller, A. (2016) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2016.03.007 · Cited by 60
Physiological Relaxation: Stress Reduction Through Fair Treatment
Vermunt, R. C., & Steensma, H. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1024200120646 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Chapter 9 From justice events to justice climate: A multi-level temporal model of information aggregation and judgment
Rupp, D. E., & Paddock, E. L. (2010) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2010)0000013012 · Cited by 59
Gender and Demand-Based Pricing: Differences in Perceived (Un)Fairness and Repatronage Intentions
Beldona, S., & Namasivayam, K. (2006) · Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing · doi:10.1300/j150v14n04_06 · Cited by 58
Money isn’t all that matters: The use of financial compensation and apologies to preserve relationships in the aftermath of distributive harm
Haesevoets, T., Folmer, C. R., Cremer, D. D., & Hiel, A. V. (2013) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.003 · Cited by 57
Social Comparison and Fairness
Folger, R. G., & Kass, E. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_20 · Cited by 57
The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice: Towards theoretical integration
van Prooijen, J., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. (2004) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280340000108 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Power and Justice
Hegtvedt, K. A., & Johnson, C. (2009) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764209338798 · Cited by 56
Ethical Considerations for Outcome‐adaptive Trial Designs: A Clinical Researcher's Perspective
Saxman, S. B. (2014) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.12084 · Cited by 55
The role of pay secrecy policies and employee secrecy preferences in shaping job attitudes
Smit, B. W., & Montag‐Smit, T. A. (2018) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12180 · Cited by 55
A fairway to fairness: Toward a richer conceptualization of fairness perceptions for just energy transitions
Bal, M., Stok, F. M., Bombaerts, G. J. T., Huijts, N. M. A., Schneider, P., Spahn, A., & Buskens, V. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103213 · Cited by 54
Consumer Response to Versioning: How Brands’ Production Methods Affect Perceptions of Unfairness
Gershoff, A. D., Kivetz, R., & Keinan, A. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/663777 · Cited by 54
De menselijke beslisser : Over de psychologie van keuze en gedrag
Prast, H. M., Thomas, C. A., Tiemeijer, W. L., & Regeringsbele, W. R. V. H. (2009) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789089642028 · Cited by 53
Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: Reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge.
See, K. E. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013266 · Cited by 52
Fairness in human judgement in assessment: a hermeneutic literature review and conceptual framework
Valentine, N. A., Durning, S. J., Shanahan, E. M., & Schuwirth, L. (2020) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-020-10002-1 · Cited by 51
Procedural justice and intragroup status: Knowing where we stand in a group enhances reactions to procedures
van Prooijen, J., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.12.003 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Algorithmic pricing: Effects on consumer trust and price search
Vomberg, A., Homburg, C., & Sarantopoulos, P. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.006 · Cited by 50
A Preference for War: How Fairness and Rhetoric Influence Leadership Incentives in Crises
Gottfried, M. S., & Trager, R. (2016) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqv025 · Cited by 50
Justice in Teams: The Effects of Interdependence and Identification on Referent Choice and Justice Climate Strength
Roberson, Q. M. (2006) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0010-z · Cited by 50
Revisiting the role of distributive justice in Tyler’s legitimacy theory
McLean, K. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09370-5 · Cited by 49
Linking Decision-Making Procedures to Decision Acceptance and Citizen Voice: Evidence From Two Studies
Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2018) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074017734642 · Cited by 49
Advancing value-based selling research in B2B markets: A theoretical toolbox and research agenda
Keränen, J., Totzek, D., Salonen, A., & Kienzler, M. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.02.014 · Cited by 48
Perceptions of discrimination and justice in New York City
Rice, S. K., & Piquero, A. R. (2005) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13639510510581002 · Cited by 48
What do you think is ‘fair’? Effects of ingroup norms and outcome control on fairness judgments
Hertel, G., Aarts, H., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.92 · Cited by 47
When Outcomes Prompt Criticism of Procedures: An Analysis of the Rodney King Case
Mullen, E., & Skitka, L. J. (2006) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00100.x · Cited by 46
Community‐Driven Hypothesis Testing: A Solution for the Tragedy of the Anticommons
Palma‐Oliveira, J. M., Trump, B. D., Wood, M. D., & Linkov, I. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12860 · Cited by 46
I guess that is fair: How the efforts of other customers influence buyer price fairness perceptions
Lastner, M. M., Fennell, P. B., Folse, J. A. G., Rice, D. H., & Porter, M. (2019) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21206 · Cited by 46
Perceptions of Reasons for Promotion of Self and Others
Beehr, T. A., Nair, V. N., Gudanowski, D. M., & Such, M. J. (2004) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726704043894 · Cited by 46
Justifications of Inequality: The Normative Basis of Pay Differentials in 31 Nations*
Evans, M., Kelley, J., & Peoples, C. D. (2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00738.x · Cited by 45
The Evolved Functions of Procedural Fairness: An Adaptation for Politics
Bøggild, T., & Petersen, M. B. (2015) · Evolutionary psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_12 · Cited by 45
Appropriateness of decisions as a moderator of the psychology of voice
van den Bos, K., & Spruijt, N. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.61 · Cited by 45
The role of contingent self-esteem and trust in consumer satisfaction: Examining perceived control and fairness as predictors
Namasivayam, K., & Guchait, P. (2012) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.08.002 · Cited by 44
Demographics in Service Encounters: Effects of Racial and Gender Congruence on Perceived Fairness
Kulik, C. T., & Holbrook, R. L. (2000) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1007675010798 · Cited by 44
Trust in Decision-Making Authorities Dictates the Form of the Interactive Relationship Between Outcome Fairness and Procedural Fairness
Bianchi, E. C., Brockner, J., van den Bos, K., Seifert, M., Moon, H. K., van Dijke, M., & Cremer, D. D. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214556237 · Cited by 43
On the Psychology of the Uncertain Self and the Integration of the Worldview Defense Zoo
van den Bos, K. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400903448532 · Cited by 42
HOT COGNITION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE JUDGMENTS The Combined Influence of Cognitive and Affective Factors on the Justice Judgment Process
van den Bos, K. (2007) · Information Age Publishing eBooks · Cited by 42
Does process fairness affect job performance? It only matters if they plan to stay
Collins, B. J., Mossholder, K. W., & Taylor, S. G. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1779 · Cited by 42
Fairness and other leadership heuristics: A four-nation study
Janson, A., Levy, L. S., Sitkin, S. B., & Lind, E. A. (2008) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701746510 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Social Psychology of Justice: Origins, Central Issues, Recent Developments, and Future Directions
Kazemi, A., & Törnblom, K. (2008) · Nordic Psychology · doi:10.1027/1901-2276.60.3.209 · Cited by 42
Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: How approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice.
van Prooijen, J., Karremans, J. C., & van Beest, I. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.686 · Cited by 42
Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions
Kim, T., Wang, J., Chen, T., Zhu, Y., & Sun, R. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21944 · Cited by 41
Features of the Value Function for Voice and Their Consistency across Participants from Four Countries: Great Britain, Mexico, The Netherlands, and the United States
Price, K. H., Hall, T. W., van den Bos, K., Hunton, J. E., Lovett, S., & Tippett, M. J. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2921 · Cited by 41
Using pre-test explanations to improve test-taker reactions: Testing a set of “wise” interventions
McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Campion, M. C., Iddekinge, C. H. V., & Campion, M. A. (2017) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.04.002 · Cited by 41
Determinants of Perceived Pay Inequities: The Effects of Comparison Other Characteristics and Pay‐System Communication1
Werner, S., & Öneş, D. S. (2000) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02521.x · Cited by 40
An affective-experiential perspective on reactions to fair and unfair events: Individual differences in affect intensity moderated by experiential mindsets
Maas, M., & van den Bos, K. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.014 · Cited by 40
Effects of Social Value Orientations on Fairness Judgments
Anderson, W. D., & Patterson, M. L. (2008) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.148.2.223-246 · Cited by 38
Economic Hardship and Well-Being: Examining the Relative Role of Individual Resources and Welfare State Effort in Resilience Against Economic Hardship
Reeskens, T., & Vandecasteele, L. (2016) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9716-2 · Cited by 38
Predicting turnover intention among auditors: Is WIPL a mediator?
Gim, G. C. W., & Ramayah, T. (2019) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2019.1606214 · Cited by 38
Customer perceptions of justice in service transactions: the effects of strong and weak ties
Holbrook, R. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.108 · Cited by 38
Perceived overall injustice and organizational deviance—Mediating effect of anger and moderating effect of moral disengagement
Qin, G., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023724 · Cited by 37
Crime Victims’ Perceptions of Restitution: The Importance of Payment and Understanding
Ruback, B., Cares, A. C., & Haynes, S. H. (2008) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.6.697 · Cited by 37
Friend or foe? The impact of relational ties with comparison others on outcome fairness and satisfaction judgments
Sherf, E. N., & Venkataramani, V. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.02.002 · Cited by 37
Should Firms Use Small Financial Benefits to Express Appreciation to Consumers? Understanding and Avoiding Trivialization Effects
Liu, P. J., Lamberton, C. P., & Haws, K. L. (2015) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.14.0091 · Cited by 36
The Motivational Effects of Pay Fairness
Wu, X., Sturman, M. C., & Wang, C. (2013) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1938965512471891 · Cited by 36
Perceived fairness of revenue management practices in casual and fine-dining restaurants
Tang, J. C. H., Repetti, T., & Raab, C. (2019) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights · doi:10.1108/jhti-10-2018-0063 · Cited by 36
On the Psychology of the Advantaged: How People React to Being Overpaid
Peters, S. L., van den Bos, K., & Karremans, J. C. (2008) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0063-2 · Cited by 36
On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: Because of the prosocial nature of people, behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve.
van den Bos, K., Lange, P. A. M. V., Lind, E. A., Venhoeven, L. A., Beudeker, D. A., Cramwinckel, F. M., Smulders, L., & van der Laan, J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023556 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
The Moderating Effect of Negative Affectivity in the Procedural Justice-Job Satisfaction Relation.
Irving, P. G., Coleman, D. F., & Bobocel, D. R. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0087242 · Cited by 34
Assimilation and contrast in organizational justice: The role of primed mindsets in the psychology of the fair process effect
van den Bos, K. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00033-x · Cited by 34
The Moral Superiority Effect: Self Versus Other Differences in Satisfaction with Being Overpaid
Peters, S. L., van den Bos, K., & Bobocel, D. R. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000041293.24615.f7 · Cited by 32
Effects of Anonymity and Social Comparison of Rewards on Computer-Mediated Group Brainstorming
McLeod, P. L. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410397381 · Cited by 31
Communist footprint and subordinate influence behavior in post-communist transition economies
Banalieva, E. R., Karam, C. M., Ralston, D. A., Elenkov, D. S., Naoumova, I., Dabić, M., Potočan, V., Starkus, A., Danis, W. M., & Wallace, A. (2016) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.002 · Cited by 31
And Justice for Some: Race, Crime, and Punishment in the US Criminal Justice System
Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (2010) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423910000120 · Cited by 30
Legitimacy Processes and Emotional Responses to Injustice
Johnson, C., Hegtvedt, K. A., Khanna, N., & Scheuerman, H. L. (2016) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272516645317 · Cited by 30
The relationship between subjectivity in managerial performance evaluation and the three dimensions of justice perception
Tran, T., Lepistö, S., & Järvinen, J. T. (2021) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-021-00319-2 · Cited by 30
Interactional justice and the fair process effect: The role of outcome uncertainty
Hui, M. K., Au, K. Y.-F., & Zhao, X. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.014 · Cited by 30
Achieving Sustainability and Fairness in Water Reform
Syme, G. J., & Nancarrow, B. E. (2006) · Water International · doi:10.1080/02508060608691911 · Cited by 30
On the psychology of procedural justice: reactions to procedures of ingroup vs. outgroup authorities
Ståhl, T., van Prooijen, J., & Vermunt, R. C. (2004) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.190 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
The effect of intra-workplace pay inequality on employee trust in managers: Assessing a multilevel moderated mediation effect model
Schulz, F., Valizade, D., & Charlwood, A. (2021) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726721994193 · Cited by 29
Role of Information Asymmetry and Situational Salience in Reducing Intergroup Bias
Valenzuela, A., & Srivastava, J. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212458327 · Cited by 29
Unearned Preferential Treatment
Zhang, L., & Hanks, L. (2015) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1938965515575422 · Cited by 29
Exploring a Causal Relationship between Vertical and Horizontal Trust
Eek, D., & Rothstein, B. (2005) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 29
The Role of Resource and Relational Concerns for Procedural Justice
Heuer, L. B., Penrod, S., Hafer, C. L., & Cohn, I. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702237575 · Cited by 29
Access to Justice: The Quality of the ProcedurePreprint
Klaming, L., & Giesen, I. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1091105 · Cited by 29
Off-Duty Deviance in the Eye of the Beholder: Implications of Moral Foundations Theory in the Age of Social Media
Cook, W. L., & Kuhn, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04501-9 · Cited by 28

Authors: van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M.
ORCID: Lind, E. Allan
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1997
Volume: 72
Issue: 5
Pages: 1034-1046
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034
OpenAlex: W4243800640
Cited by: 392
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI: 20.48
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords: perceived fairness, outcome measurement, social comparison, fairness judgments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks