The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members.

José Carlos Marques, Dominic J. Abrams, Darío Páez, Cristina Martínez-Taboada·1998·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Four minimal group experiments tested the prediction that judgments of groups and their members reflect evaluations made simultaneously but independently at the within-group and intergroup levels. On the basis of self-categorization theory and social identity theory, it was predicted that group members seek both intergroup distinctiveness and legitimization of in-group norms. In Experiments 1-3, membership (in-group, out-group), status of group members (modal, deviant), and either accountability to in-group or to out-group or salience of group norms were varied. Accountability and norm salience increased derogation of out-group normative (in-group deviant, out-group modal) and upgrading of in-group normative (in-group modal, out-group deviant) members. In Experiment 4, within-group differentiation reinforced in-group identification. These findings suggest that subjective group dynamics operate to bolster social identity when people judge modal and deviant in-group and out-group members.

Cites (2)

  1. A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior
    Cialdini, Robert B., Kallgren, Carl A., Reno, Raymond R. · 1991 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  2. In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity
    Branscombe, Nyla R., Wann, Daniel L, Noel, Jeffrey G., Coleman, Jason · 1993 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Show all 2 references

Cited by (7)

  1. Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence
    White, Katherine, Dahl, Darren W. · 2007 · Journal of Consumer Research
  2. The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identity
    Dias, Nicholas, Lelkes, Yphtach · 2022 · American Journal of Political Science
  3. ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups
    Tindale, R. Scott, Kameda, Tatsuya · 2000 · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  4. On the social influence of emotions in groups: Interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance.
    Heerdink, Marc W., van Kleef, Gerben A., Homan, Astrid C., Fischer, Agneta H. · 2013 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. A comparison of minimal group induction procedures
    Pinter, Brad, Greenwald, Anthony G. · 2011 · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

See all 285

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.976
The paper
Marques, J. C., Abrams, D. J., Páez, D., & Martínez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.