The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members.
Abstract
Four minimal group experiments tested the prediction that judgments of groups and their members reflect evaluations made simultaneously but independently at the within-group and intergroup levels. On the basis of self-categorization theory and social identity theory, it was predicted that group members seek both intergroup distinctiveness and legitimization of in-group norms. In Experiments 1-3, membership (in-group, out-group), status of group members (modal, deviant), and either accountability to in-group or to out-group or salience of group norms were varied. Accountability and norm salience increased derogation of out-group normative (in-group deviant, out-group modal) and upgrading of in-group normative (in-group modal, out-group deviant) members. In Experiment 4, within-group differentiation reinforced in-group identification. These findings suggest that subjective group dynamics operate to bolster social identity when people judge modal and deviant in-group and out-group members.
Cites (2)
- A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human BehaviorCialdini, Robert B., Kallgren, Carl A., Reno, Raymond R. · 1991 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social IdentityBranscombe, Nyla R., Wann, Daniel L, Noel, Jeffrey G., Coleman, Jason · 1993 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Cited by (7)
- Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative InfluenceWhite, Katherine, Dahl, Darren W. · 2007 · Journal of Consumer Research
- The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan IdentityDias, Nicholas, Lelkes, Yphtach · 2022 · American Journal of Political Science
- ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in GroupsTindale, R. Scott, Kameda, Tatsuya · 2000 · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- On the social influence of emotions in groups: Interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance.Heerdink, Marc W., van Kleef, Gerben A., Homan, Astrid C., Fischer, Agneta H. · 2013 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- A comparison of minimal group induction proceduresPinter, Brad, Greenwald, Anthony G. · 2011 · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.976
- The paper
- Marques, J. C., Abrams, D. J., Páez, D., & Martínez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.