Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples.

Fraley, R. Chris, Shaver, Phillip R.·1998·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Couple members separating and not separating from each other in a public airport completed a questionnaire designed to assess relationship length, attachment style, and degree of subjective distress. After they completed these measures, their attachment behavior was observed unobtrusively. Analyses suggested that adult attachment behavior is organized in a manner similar to that observed in children. Relationship length and separation status were associated with the expression of attachment behavior in adults. Analyses also indicated that women with Anxious working models were more likely to experience distress prior to a separation. But the behavioral strategies exhibited by women varied as a function of Avoidant, not Anxious, working models. Results for men were less clear. Implications for adult attachment theory and research are discussed. Throughout the history of attachment research, naturalistic studies have been regarded as an important source of information about the dynamics of attachment relationships (Colin, 1996). When John Bowlby (1969/1982) originally formulated his theory of infant- caregiver attachment, he relied heavily on naturalistic studies of infants who had been separated from their mothers (Bowlby, Robertson, & Rosenbluth, 1952; Heinicke & Westheimer, 1965; Robertson & Robertson, 1971). Similarly, his colleague Mary Ainsworth devoted considerable effort to studying child-caregiver interactions in their natural context. In her early research, she collected observational and ethnographic data on infant-mother dyads in Uganda (Ainsworth, 1967). Later, in Baltimore, she and her colleagues conducted one of the most extensive home observational studies to date on infant-mother interactions (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978). These and other observational studies (Anderson, 1972; Carr, Dabbs, & Carr, 1975; Grossmann, Grossmann, Spangler, Suess, & Unzner, 1985; Marvin, VanDevender, Iwanaga, LeVine, & LeVine, 1977) are valuable because they provide important insights into the nature and function of attachment behavior and the dynamics of affectional relationships. In the last decade, an increasing number of researchers have applied attachment theory to adult romantic relationships (see Feeney & Noller, 1996, for a review). However, unlike research on infant-caregi ver attachment, very little of the romantic attachment research has been based on observations of couples

Cites (55)

  1. Untitled work
    1969
  2. Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
    Rever, George W. · 1972 · Psychosomatic Medicine
  3. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.
    Bartholomew, Kim, Horowitz, Leonard M. · 1991 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
    Hazan, Cindy, Shaver, Phillip · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications
    1999 · Choice Reviews Online
  6. Untitled work
    1998
  7. Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.
    Collins, Nancy L., Read, Stephen J. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  8. Attachment theory and close relationships
    1998 · Choice Reviews Online
  9. Attachment and Loss: Vol.3: Loss : Sadness and Depression
    John Bowlby · 1980
  10. Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective
    Bartholomew, Kim · 1990 · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Show all 55 references

Cited by (35)

  1. Attachment Theory and Affect Regulation: The Dynamics, Development, and Cognitive Consequences of Attachment-Related Strategies
    Mikulincer, Mario, Shaver, Phillip R., Pereg, Dana · 2003 · Motivation and Emotion
  2. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior?
    Baumeister, Roy F., Vohs, Kathleen D., Funder, David C. · 2007 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  3. Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions
    Fraley, R. Chris, Shaver, Phillip R. · 2000 · Review of General Psychology
  4. The Attachment Behavioral System In Adulthood: Activation, Psychodynamics, And Interpersonal Processes
    Mikulincer, Mario, Shaver, Phillip R. · 2003 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  5. A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships
    Collins, Nancy L., Feeney, Brooke C. · 2000 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 465

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1198
The paper
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1198

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.