Cited by 378Reproductive Health and ContraceptionIdentity, Memory, and TherapySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment

Major, Brenda, Gramzow, Richard H.·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This study examined the stigma of abortion and psychological implications of concealment among 442 women followed for 2 years from the day of their abortion. As predicted, women who felt stigmatized by abortion were more likely to feel a need to keep it a secret from family and friends. Secrecy was related positively to suppressing thoughts of the abortion and negatively to disclosing abortion-related emotions to others. Greater thought suppression was associated with experiencing more intrusive thoughts of the abortion. Both suppression and intrusive thoughts, in turn, were positively related to increases in psychological distress over time. Emotional disclosure moderated the association between intrusive thoughts and distress. Disclosure was associated with decreases in distress among women experiencing intrusive thoughts of their abortion, but was unrelated to distress among women not experiencing intrusive thoughts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.735

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies involving members of other stigmatized groups have demonstrated that concealment is associated with intrusive thoughts, increased psychological distress, anxiety, and depression.

    “Studies involving members of other stigmatized groups have demonstrated that concealment is associated with intrusive thoughts, increased psychological distress, anxiety, and depression [59–61].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Major, B., & Gramzow, R. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1999-10
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
735-745
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2049950431
Cited by
378
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01mh047989-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH47989)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
abortion, stigma, concealment, secrecy, thought suppression, intrusive thoughts, emotional disclosure, psychological distress, women's mental health
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Adult, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, Truth Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review