The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feelings or Words? Understanding the Content in Self-Report Ratings of Experienced Emotion.
Open accessAbstract
People differ in the extent to which their verbal reports of experienced emotion are valence focused or arousal focused. Three multimethod studies are reported to explore whether differential focus reflects individual differences in the cognitive structure of emotion language versus differences in phenomenological experience. Although there was some evidence that valence focus and arousal focus were linked to variations differences in cognitive structure, the findings are also consistent with the view that self-report ratings are being driven by the properties of the feelings that are being reported. Implications for the study of experienced emotion are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Ironic processes of mental control.
Wegner, D. M. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.101.1.34 · Cited by 2,609
Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.377 · Cited by 2,205
Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930143000239 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationWenzlaff, R. M., & Wegner, D. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.59 · Cited by 1,063
Facial and vocal expressions of emotion
Russell, J. A., Bachorowski, J.-A., & Fernández-Dols, J.-M. (2003) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145102 · Cited by 873
Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework.
Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.219 · Cited by 760
Discrete Emotions or Dimensions? The Role of Valence Focus and Arousal Focus
Barrett, L. F. (1998) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/026999398379574 · Cited by 645 · cited 4×
“…strong negative correlations were observed between valence focus–2 and arousal focus–2, replicating previous findings that the two are inversely related to one another (Feldman, 1995a; Feldman Barrett, 1998), although this relationship did not appear for valence focus–1 and arousal focus–1.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000446 · Cited by 2,320
“…lab documented individual differences in the specificity with which people use emotion words to describe experience (termed “emotional granularity”; Barrett 1998; 2004; Feldman 1995) even though researchers often assume that anger, disgust, sadness, and other emotions are basic in a Roschian…”
Self-citationAmabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367 · Cited by 2,208
Barrett, L. F. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x · Cited by 1,859
Self-citationEmotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements
Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M., & Pollak, S. D. (2019) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100619832930 · Cited by 1,748
Self-citationTugade, M. M., Fredrickson, B. L., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2004) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00294.x · Cited by 1,610
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrett, L. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-281
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2157402253
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feelings or Words? Understanding the Content in Self-Report Ratings of Experienced Emotion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.266
- The paper
- Barrett, L. F. (2004). Feelings or Words? Understanding the Content in Self-Report Ratings of Experienced Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.