Cited by 284Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender and Feminist StudiesSexual function and dysfunction studies

Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films.

Chivers, Meredith L., Seto, Michael C., Blanchard, Ray·2007·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

In this study, the authors investigated the hypothesis that women's sexual orientation and sexual responses in the laboratory correlate less highly than do men's because women respond primarily to the sexual activities performed by actors, whereas men respond primarily to the gender of the actors. The participants were 20 homosexual women, 27 heterosexual women, 17 homosexual men, and 27 heterosexual men. The videotaped stimuli included men and women engaging in same-sex intercourse, solitary masturbation, or nude exercise (no sexual activity); human male-female copulation; and animal (bonobo chimpanzee or Pan paniscus) copulation. Genital and subjective sexual arousal were continuously recorded. The genital responses of both sexes were weakest to nude exercise and strongest to intercourse. As predicted, however, actor gender was more important for men than for women, and the level of sexual activity was more important for women than for men. Consistent with this result, women responded genitally to bonobo copulation, whereas men did not. An unexpected result was that homosexual women responded more to nude female targets exercising and masturbating than to nude male targets, whereas heterosexual women responded about the same to both sexes at each activity level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R.
Affiliations
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2007
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
1108-1121
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2123451707
Cited by
284
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
sexual orientation, gender differences, sexual arousal, sexual response, animal sexual behavior, masturbation, genital arousal, homosexual women, heterosexual women, gay men, heterosexual men
MeSH terms
Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Pictures, Sexual Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review