Cited by 534Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexual Differentiation and DisordersGender and Feminist Studies

A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal

Chivers, Meredith L., Rieger, Gerulf, Latty, Elizabeth, Bailey, J. Michael·2004·Psychological Science

Abstract

Sexual arousal is category-specific in men; heterosexual men are more aroused by female than by male sexual stimuli, whereas homosexual men show the opposite pattern. There is reason to believe that female sexual arousal is organized differently. We assessed genital and subjective sexual arousal to male and female sexual stimuli in women, men, and postoperative male-to-female transsexuals. In contrast to men, women showed little category specificity on either the genital or the subjective measure. Both heterosexual and homosexual women experienced strong genital arousal to both male and female sexual stimuli. Transsexuals showed a category-specific pattern, demonstrating that category specificity can be detected in the neovagina using a photoplethysmographic measure of female genital sexual arousal. In a second study, we showed that our results for females are unlikely to be explained by ascertainment biases. These findings suggest that sexual arousal patterns play fundamentally different roles in male and female sexuality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Chivers, Meredith L.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2004-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
736-744
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2166246062
Cited by
534
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 26
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03hd041770-01)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03-HD41770-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
sexual arousal, category specificity, sex differences, female sexual arousal, male-to-female transsexuals, neovagina, genital arousal, subjective arousal, sexual orientation, homosexual women, heterosexual women
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Libido, Male, Photic Stimulation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sexual Behavior, Sex Factors, Transsexualism, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review