Differential Gaze Behavior towards Sexually Preferred and Non-Preferred Human Figures
Open accessAbstract
The gaze pattern associated with image exploration is a sensitive index of our attention, motivation, and preference. To examine whether an individual's gaze behavior can reflect his or her sexual interest, this study compared gaze patterns of young heterosexual men and women (M = 19.94 years, SD = 1.05) while they viewed photographs of plain-clothed male and female figures aged from birth to 60 years old. The analysis revealed a clear gender difference in viewing sexually preferred figure images. Men displayed a distinctive gaze pattern only when viewing 20-year-old female images, with more fixations and longer viewing times dedicated to the upper body and waist-hip regions. Women also directed more attention at the upper body on female images in comparison to male images, but this difference was not age-specific. Analysis of local image salience revealed that observers' eye-scanning strategies could not be accounted for by low-level processes, such as analyzing local image contrast and structure, but were associated with attractiveness judgments. The results suggest that the difference in cognitive processing of sexually preferred and non-preferred figures can be manifested in gaze patterns associated with figure viewing. Thus, eye-tracking holds promise as a potential sensitive measure for sexual preference, particularly in men.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women gaze more at the eyes of others.
“Women also gaze more at the eyes of others [3]”
From Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979 · see citing works
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1150 · Cited by 924 · see citing works
Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures.
Nummenmaa, L., Hyönä, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.257 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice
Karlsson, S. A., Haziri, K., Hansson, E., Kettunen, P., & Westberg, L. (2015) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-015-0221-z · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Women also gaze more at the eyes of others [3] and the risk for autism spectrum disorders is lower in girls than in boys.”
Background
- Authors
- Hall, C., Hogue, T., & Guo, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Lincoln (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Kun
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-10-20
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 461-469
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2020028197
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- gaze behavior, sexual preference, sexual interest, eye scanning, attractiveness judgments, gender differences, heterosexuals, eye tracking, visual attention, waist-to-hip ratio
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Body Composition, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Students, Universities, Visual Perception, Human Body, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review